Let $x>0$, find the limit $$\lim_\limits{n\to{\infty}}{n^2\left(\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[{n + 1}]{x}\right)}$$

I use Maclaurin series and find out that the limit is $\ln x$. And this is the answer I get from a math forum:

"Let $x_n=\sqrt[n]{x}-1$, $y_n=\dfrac{1}{n}$, then $(x_n)\to0,(y_n)\to0,(y_n)\downarrow$ when $n\to\infty$.

Use Stolz-Cesaro theorem, we have:

$$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{\sqrt[n]{x} - \sqrt[{n + 1}]{x}}}{{\frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{{n + 1}}}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{\sqrt[n]{x} - 1}}{{\frac{1}{n}}} = \ln x$$ Then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } {n^2}\left( {\sqrt[n]{x} - \sqrt[{n + 1}]{x}} \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{{n^2}}}{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}\cdot\dfrac{{\sqrt[n]{x} - \sqrt[{n + 1}]{x}}}{{\frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{{n + 1}}}} = \ln x$.


I just wonder what form Stolz-Cesaro theorem that he used, because I just learn Stolz-Cesaro theorem when $(y_n)\to\infty$.

Could anyone help me to get this? Thank you in advance.

This is "another form of Stolz theorem" in the forum that I mentioned: Let $(x_n),(y_n)$ be two sequences of real numbers. Assume $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } {x_n} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } {y_n} = 0$; $y_n>0$, $(y_n)$ is strictly decreasing and the following limit exist $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{{x_{n + 1}} - {x_n}}}{{{y_{n + 1}} - {y_n}}} = L$. Then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{{x_n}}}{{{y_n}}} = L$. Is this correct?

  • $\begingroup$ Take a look at my answer at math.stackexchange.com/questions/934774/…, try to use that formula to rationalize your expression. $\endgroup$ – user175968 Feb 28 '17 at 17:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Also important: Stolz-Cesaro would only say that if the first limtiexosts, then it equals the second limit $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Feb 28 '17 at 17:37

Indeed, most of us (including me) only learn of the version of the Stolz-Cesàro theorem where $b_n \to \infty$ and $(b_n)_{n \ge 1}$ is strictly increasing. Interestingly, there is another version of this theorem, where $b_n \to 0$ and $(b_n)_{n \ge 1}$ is strictly monotone:

Let $(a_n)_{n \ge 1}$ and $(b_n)_{n \ge 1}$ be sequences of strictly monotone real numbers with $a_n \to 0$ and $b_n \to 0$. If $\lim \limits _{n \to \infty} \dfrac {a_{n+1} - a_n} {b_{n+1} - b_n} = l \in \bar {\Bbb R}$, then $\left( \dfrac {a_n} {b_n} \right)_{n \ge 1}$ also has a limit and $\lim \limits _{n \to \infty} \dfrac {a_n} {b_n} = l$.

You may find a proof in "Real Analysis on Intervals" by A. D. R. Choudary and C. Niculescu - theorem 2.7.1 (you may even download the relevant chapter from the publisher).

This situation is a perfect parallel to what happens with l'Hospital's theorem, where again there are two versions: one when the denominator tends to $0$, another one when it tends to $\infty$.


$$\lim_\limits{n\to{\infty}}{n^2\left(\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[{n + 1}]{x}\right)}=\lim_{n\to\infty}n/(n+1)\cdot x^{1/(n+1)}\cdot\dfrac{x^{1/n(n+1)}-1}{ 1/n(n+1)}=? $$

  • $\begingroup$ Not what the OP asks about. $\endgroup$ – Alex M. Feb 28 '17 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ +1 for the right approach. Solution given in the question is wrong. $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh Mar 1 '17 at 5:31

You can make use of Taylor expansion:

$$\sqrt[n]{x}=1+\frac{\log(x)}{n}+\frac{\log(x)^2}{2n^2}+O\left(\frac{1}{n^3}\right)$$ $$\sqrt[n+1]{x}=1+\frac{\log(x)}{n}+\frac{\log(x)^2}{2n^2}-\frac{\log(x)}{n^2}+O\left(\frac{1}{n^3}\right)$$ So $$\left(\sqrt[n]{x}-\sqrt[{n + 1}]{x}\right)=\frac{\log(x)}{n^2}+O\left(\frac{1}{n^3}\right)$$ Multiplying by $n^2$ and taking the limit finishes the solution.


The version of Cesaro-Stolz you mention is correct, but it's application for the problem at hand is wrong. The theorem is used to deduce the limit of $a_n/b_n$ from that of $(a_n-a_{n+1})/(b_n-b_{n+1})$ and not the other way round. The right approach to solve the problem is given by user "lab bhattacharjee" in his answer.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The other way around (reciprocal SC) works if $b_n \to \infty$ and $b_n/b_{n+1} \to L \neq 1$ but that is not the case here. (+1) Also I'm not sure if there is a reciprocal SC when $b_n$ is decreasing. $\endgroup$ – RRL Mar 1 '17 at 5:40
  • $\begingroup$ @RRL: Thanks for the info. I was not aware that a converse of SC existed. +1 for the comment. $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh Mar 1 '17 at 6:42
  • $\begingroup$ FYI: I posted a question (that includes a proof). math.stackexchange.com/q/2166597/148510 $\endgroup$ – RRL Mar 1 '17 at 8:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.