The Riemann Zeta Function is most commonly defined as $$\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s}$$ There is some sort of million dollar prize that involves proving the real part of complex number s must be $\frac{1}{2}$ for all nontrivial zeros. Of course this intregued me, because well, it's a million dollars. Odds are I won't solve it, but still. Anyway, I started looking at it and realized that you'd be raising a number to a complex power. This made no sense to me, so I went online and found Euler's formula that explains how that would work $$e^{i\pi}=-1$$ It turns out that the smallest nontrivial zeros is at about $\frac{1}{2}+14.1345i$, so I plugged it in to the zeta function. I used Desmos.com, and used separate summations for the real and imaginary parts. I expected to get zero. I did not get zero. In fact, the bigger I had the summation get, say, instead of summing to 1000000, I'd sum to 1000000000, the further off I would get from zero.

So tell me, how exactly are values for the Riemann Zeta Function computed?

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ That formula for the zeta function works only when $\text{Re}(s) > 1$. For other values of $s \neq 1$ on the complex plane, we need to use it's analytic continuation formula $\zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1} \sin\left(\dfrac{\pi s}{2}\right) \Gamma(1 - s) \zeta(1 - s)$ $\endgroup$ Feb 20, 2017 at 14:00
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, this formula: $\xi(s) = \pi^{-s/2}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s)$. The $\xi(s)$ satisfies $\xi(s) = \xi(1 - s)$ and is defined everywhere except $s = 1$. $\endgroup$ Feb 20, 2017 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ Try this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ Feb 20, 2017 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ Oh.... hold up sir. Please don't mark my answer as accepted, as you will likely receive more answers soon. $\endgroup$ Feb 20, 2017 at 14:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @HenriqueAugustoSouza That reflection formula doesn't reach $\zeta(s)$ for $0\le\Re(s)\le1$ $\endgroup$ Feb 20, 2017 at 14:37

2 Answers 2


One may note that when $\Re(s)\le1$,

$$\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac1{k^s}\approx\int_1^\infty\frac1{x^s}\ dx\to\infty$$

Thus, we'll need a different representation of the zeta function. If we let $\eta(s)$ be the alternating form of the zeta function,




Thus, it follows that


By taking the Euler sum of the $\eta$ function, we get

$$\eta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac1{2^{1+n}}\sum_{k=0}^n\binom nk\frac{(-1)^k}{(k+1)^s}$$

and thus, we reach a globally convergent form of the Riemann zeta function:

$$\zeta(s)=\frac1{1-2^{1-s}}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac1{2^{1+n}}\sum_{k=0}^n\binom nk\frac{(-1)^k}{(k+1)^s}$$

and when testing for zeroes, the $\frac1{1-2^{1-s}}$ part is negligible.


1 Answer cannot be correct. The author claims that his result is globally convergent. But it is not globally convergent to the zeta function. It is known that zeta(0)=-1/2 However if we set s=0 in his/her result the inner (second) sum reduces to the sum from k=0 to n of n!(-1)^k/((n-k)!(k)!) which is zero (by the binomial theorem). You can reply at adwunsch@gmail.com

  • $\begingroup$ I withdraw my comment . The k=0, n=0 term gives the right answer. $\endgroup$ May 5, 2019 at 22:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.