Does Leibniz's rule hold for improper integrals? Does this hold in general?
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x,t) \mathrm{d}x = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}f(x,t) \mathrm{d}x.
$$
I know it is true if the bounds on the integral are finite but can the result be extended to improper integrals? Also if it is true in special cases, what are those cases?
Thanks a lot!
 A: 
No, the equality does not hold in general.  

EXAMPLE $1$
For a first example, the integral $I(x)$ as given by 
$$I(x)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{\sin(xt)}{t}\,dt$$
converges uniformly for all $|x|\ge \delta>0$.  But the integral of the derivative with respect to $x$, $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos(xt)\,dt$ diverges for all $x$.

EXAMPLE $2$
As another example, let $J(x)$ be the integral given by 
$$J(x)=\int_0^\infty x^3e^{-x^2t}\,dt$$
Obviously, $J(x)=x$ for all $x$ and hence $J'(x)=1$.  However, 
$$\int_0^\infty (3x^2-2x^4t)e^{-x^2t}\,dt=\begin{cases}1&,x\ne 0\\\\0&,x=0\end{cases}$$
Thus, formal differentiation under the integral sign leads to an incorrect result for $x=0$ even though all integrals involved are absolutely convergent.


Sufficient Conditions for Differentiating Under the Integral

If $f(x,t)$ and $\frac{\partial f(x,t)}{\partial x}$ are continuous for all $x\in [a,b]$ and $t\in \mathbb{R}$, and if $\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x,t)\,dt$ converges for some $x_0\in[a,b]$ and $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\partial f(x,t)}{\partial x}\,dt$ converges uniformly for all $x\in [a,b]$, then 
$$\frac{d}{dx}\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x,t)\,dt=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\partial f(x,t)}{\partial x}\,dt$$
