Here's the question I'm hopelessly on:

Let $X_1, X_2, \dots$ be an $iid$ sequence of Bernoulli random variables on $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ with $\mathbb{P}(X_i = 1)=1/2$. Let

$$X = 3\sum_{k=1}^\infty 4^{-k}X_k.$$

Show that the distribution function $F(x)$ of $X$ is not absolutely continuous w.r.t the lebesgue measure.

I've compared this to the cantor function, which shares many of the same properties. What I'm trying to show is that $F$ only changes values on a set of Lebesgue measure zero, but without success.

Trying to find a set with lebesgue measure zero but positive probability hasn't bourne fruit either.


Claim: For every $n\geqslant0$, let $Y_n=3\sum\limits_{k=1}^{n}4^{-k}X_k$ and $Z_n=3\sum\limits_{k=n+1}^{+\infty}4^{-k}X_k$. Then $Y_n$ can take (at most) $2^n$ values and $0\leqslant Z_n\leqslant4^{-n}$.

Consequence: For every $n\geqslant0$, $X=Y_n+Z_n$ hence $\mathbb P(X\in U_n)=1$ where $U_n$ is the union of (at most) $2^n$ intervals of length $4^{-n}$. The Lebesgue measure of $U_n$ is (at most) $2^n\cdot4^{-n}=2^{-n}\to0$ when $n\to\infty$. Let $U=\bigcap\limits_{n\geqslant0}U_n$. Then $\mathbb P(X\in U)=1$ and the Lebesgue measure of $U$ is zero.

This proves the distribution of $X$ is purely singular.


Step 1. Move to a nice setting.

It causes no difference if we realize such an i.i.d. sequence $(X_i)$ on the space

$$(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \Bbb{P}) = ([0, 1), \mathcal{B}, \lambda),$$

where $\mathcal{B}$ is the Borel field on $[0, 1)$ and $\lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure, such that for each $\omega \in \Omega$

$$ X_i(\omega) = i\text{-th digit of } \omega \text{ in base 2 }.$$

This definition has no ambiguity unless $\omega$ is rational, which is contained in a null-set $\Bbb{Q} \cap \Omega$. But for the sake of simplicity, we modify its value on this null-set so that $X_i$ is right-continuous. Then the resulting $(X_i, i \geq 1)$ is a sequence of independent Bernoulli random variables.

Now, as a function on $[0, 1)$, we may extend each $X_i$ to a 1-periodic function $f_i : \Bbb{R} \to \{0, 1\}$. Then it is easy to observe that $f_{i+1}(x) = f_i(2x)$. Thus we may write

$$ X_i(\omega) = f_{1}(2^{i-1}\omega). $$

Thus the partial sum

$$ S_n (\omega) = 3 \sum_{i=1}^{n} 4^{-i} X_i (\omega) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} 4^{-i} f_1(2^{i-1}\omega)$$


$$ S_1(\omega) = \frac{3}{4} f_1(\omega), \quad S_{n+1}(\omega) = S_1(\omega) + \frac{1}{4} S_n(2\omega). \tag{1}$$

We also note that the limit $X = \lim_{n\to\infty} S_n$ converges both absolutely and uniformly.

Step 2. Identify some important properties of the limit $X$

Let $C$ be a Cantor-like set obtained by the following procedure: Starting from the unit interval $[0, 1]$, delete the concentric open interval with the length half of the original interval. Repeat this process to each remnant closed intervals. Clearly, $C$ is a closed set with zero measure. Moreover, from its construction it is clear that $C$ has the following self-similarity: $$ C = \left( \frac{1}{4}C \right) \cup \left( \frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{4}C \right). \tag{2}$$

Now we claim that for each $n$,

  1. $S_n (\omega)$ is monotone increasing and right continuous.
  2. The range of $S_n (\omega)$, which is denoted by $\mathrm{Rng} \, S_n = \{ S_n(\omega) : \omega \in \Omega \}$, is contained in $C$.

Indeed, for $n = 1$ the property 1 is clear. Also, $\mathrm{Rng} \, S_1 = \{0, \frac{3}{4} \}$ is clearly a subset of $C$. Next, assume both the property 1 and 2 hold for $n$. Then by $(1)$, the property 1 still holds for $n+1$ and

$$ \mathrm{Rng} \, S_{n+1} = \left( \frac{1}{4} \mathrm{Rng} \, S_{n} \right) \cup \left( \frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{4} \mathrm{Rng} \, S_{n} \right) \subset \left( \frac{1}{4}C \right) \cup \left( \frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{4}C \right) = C,$$

from which the claim is confirmed.

Since $C$ is closed and $S_n(\omega)$ converges uniformly to $X$, we find that $X$ is also monotone-increasing and right-continuous, and that the range of $X$ is also contained in $C$. It is also trivial to check that $X(1-) = 1$.

Step 3. Prove the claim.

Let $F$ be the CDF of $X$. That is,

$$ F(x) = \Bbb{P}(X \leq x). $$

Clearly we have

$$ F(x) = 0 \text{ if } x \leq 0 \quad \text{and} \quad F_X(x) = 1 \text{ if } x \geq 1.$$

This enables us to restrict our attention to the case $x \in (0, 1)$. Since $X$ is monotone increasing and right-continuous,

$$ F(x) = \Bbb{P}(X \leq x) = \lambda (X^{-1}[0, x]) = \max \{\omega \in \Omega : X(\omega) \leq x \}. $$

But since $C^c = [0, 1] \setminus C$ is an open set and contains no values of $X$, it is clear that $F$ is locally constant on $C^c$. In particular, we have $F'(x) = 0$ on $C^c$. Since $\lambda(C^c) = 1$, this proves that

$$F'(x) = 0 \quad \text{a.e.} $$

Therefore $F$ is not absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure. (In fact, this proves that $F$ is singular.) ////

Please tell me if there is a typo or an error. It's 4:00 a.m. here and I'm half-nodding.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.