If we have a function $\tilde{f}\in L^p(T)$ on the unit circle $T$ with $p \geq 1$ we can regain a harmonic function $f$ on the unit disk using the Poisson kernel $P_r$:

$$ f\left(re^{i\theta}\right)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} P_r(\theta-\phi) \tilde f\left(e^{i\phi}\right) \,\mathrm{d}\phi, \quad r < 1 $$

It looks somewhat similar to the Cauchy's Integral formula. The latter states that a holomorphic function defined on a disk is completely determined by its values on the boundary $\gamma$ of the disk.

$$ f(a)={\frac {1}{2\pi i}}\oint _{\gamma }{\frac {f(z)}{z-a}}\,dz $$


1) Could you please explain the logic behind the integral transformation with the Poisson kernel? Why does the kernel have the form $P_{r}(\theta )=\operatorname {Re} \left({\frac {1+re^{i\theta }}{1-re^{i\theta }}}\right),\ 0\leq r<1$ ?

2) What is the difference between the integral transformation with the Poisson kernel and the Cauchy's integral formula?

Thank you for your help in advance.


1 Answer 1


The usual Cauchy kernel is a member of a wider family: we can add an arbitrary holomorphic function. If $h$ is holomorphic on the closed disk then $$ f(a) = \frac1{2\pi i}\oint_{|z|=1} f(z) \left(\frac1{z-a}+h(z)\right) \mathrm{d}z = \frac1{2\pi}\oint_{|z|=1} f(z) \left(\frac1{1-a\bar{z}}+zh(z)\right) \frac{\mathrm{d}z}{iz}. $$ $$ = \frac1{2\pi}\oint_{|z|=1} f(z) \left(1+\frac{a\bar{z}}{1-a\bar{z}}+zh(z)\right) \frac{\mathrm{d}z}{iz}. $$

From this point we can look for a function $zh(z)$ (which must have a root at $0$) such that the modified kernel $1+\frac{a\bar{z}}{1-a\bar{z}}+zh(z)$ is real along the unit circle. (Notice that $\frac{\mathrm{d}z}{iz} = \mathrm{d}(\arg z)$ is real.) This can be done by choosing $$ zh(z) = \overline{\left(\frac{a\bar{z}}{1-a\bar{z}}\right)} = \frac{\bar{a}z}{1-\bar{a}z}, $$ so $$ h(z) = \frac{\bar{a}}{1-\bar{a}z}, $$ that is holomorphic in the disk $|z|<\frac1{|a|}$.

Hence, the modified kernel is $$ 1+\frac{a\bar{z}}{1-a\bar{z}} + \overline{\left(\frac{a\bar{z}}{1-a\bar{z}}\right)} = \mathrm{Re}\left(1+2\frac{a\bar{z}}{1-a\bar{z}}\right) = \mathrm{Re}\left(\frac{1+\bar{a}z}{1-\bar{a}z}\right). $$

Therefore, the difference between the Cauchy and the Poission kernels is a holomorphic function. :-)

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the reply! Could you please explain: 1) why do we need the modified kernel to be real along the unit circle? 2) how did you do this step $\frac1{2\pi}\oint_{|z|=1} f(z) \left(\frac1{1-a\bar{z}}+zh(z)\right) \frac{\mathrm{d}z}{iz}$? $\endgroup$
    – Konstantin
    Feb 24, 2017 at 16:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 1) If the kernel is real then the same formula holds for the real part, so we achieve Poisson's formula. 2) First we want something purely real instead of $dz$. Then we apply $\bar{z}z=1$ along the circle. $\endgroup$
    – G.Kós
    Feb 24, 2017 at 21:57
  • $\begingroup$ @user141614 very nice answer. I am quite rusty on complex analysis, however, so I can't remember how or why the first sentence of your answer is true. Could you suggest a reference I can look up? Many thanks $\endgroup$
    – pdini
    Apr 22, 2020 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ @pdini this follows from Cauchy's theorem namely the fact that $\oint_{|z|=1} g(z) dz = 0$ for any $g$ holomorphic on $|z|\le 1$. If this is not clear, then please ask a new question $\endgroup$ Sep 20, 2020 at 7:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @CalvinKhor. After asking this question I went back to Tristan Needham's great book Visual Complex Analysis and reminded myself why one can add an arbitrary holomorphic function -- precisely as you say. I meant to come back here and add this reference but forgot. Thanks again for your reply. $\endgroup$
    – pdini
    Sep 21, 2020 at 8:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.