3
$\begingroup$

I am reading "Complex geometry" by D. Huybrecht. On p.223 the books says that "If $c_{1}(X)=0$, e.g. if the canonical bundle $K_{X}$ is trivial, and $g$ is Kähler–Einstein metric, then $\operatorname{Ric}(X,g)=0$. Indeed in this case the scalar factor $\lambda$ is necessarily trivial and hence $\operatorname{Ric}(X,g)=\lambda\omega=0$, i.e. the Kähler metric $g$ is Ricci-flat."

Remember that we say a metric $g$ is Kähler–Einstein if $\operatorname{Ric}(X,g)=\lambda \omega$ for some constant $\lambda\in \mathbb{R}$. Here $\omega$ is the Kähler form associated to $g$.

My question is, why does Kähler–Einstein mean $\lambda=0$ in $c_{1}(X)=0$ case? If this is true, any Kähler–Einstein metric on Calabi–Yau manifold is Ricci-flat?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

I now understand why; the scalar factor $\lambda$ can be explicitly computed as $$ \lambda=\frac{2\pi \int_{X}c_{1}(X)\wedge \omega^{n-1}}{\int_{X}\omega^n}. $$ So Kähler–Einstein metric on Calabi–Yau manifold is necessarily Ricci flat metric!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.