3
$\begingroup$

I came across this expression:

$\tilde{\Phi}(\mu, \nu)\ \dot{=}\ \int_{A\times B}{\Phi(a, b)\ \mathrm{d}\mu \otimes \mathrm{d}\nu}$

In a context where:

  • $A$ and $B$ are compact metric spaces
  • $\mu$ and $\nu$ are probability distribution over $A$ and $B$, resp.
  • $\Phi$ is a continuous function $A \times B \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$
  • $\tilde{\Phi}(\mu, \nu)$ is said to be the expected value of $\Phi$

I understand that you need to integrate over $A \times B$ to get this expected value, and to take $\mu$ and $\nu$ distributions into account while doing this. But..

How am I supposed to understand the $\otimes$ symbol here? What is this operation? How does $\mathrm{d}\mu$ relates to $a$ and $\mathrm{d}\nu$ relates to $b$ within this integrand?

(To get the full context, I've found this in these pretty neat notes introducing differential game theory (equation 2.8 page 13).)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How familiar are you with measure theory? $\endgroup$ – Michael McGovern Feb 15 '17 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelMcGovern Novice. But I can read and learn :) `currently heading towards Wikipedia. Cheers for the pointer! $\endgroup$ – iago-lito Feb 15 '17 at 16:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here, $\otimes$ stands for a [product measure][1]. [1] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_measure $\endgroup$ – Michael McGovern Feb 15 '17 at 17:05
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelMcGovern heading to this now. Thank you :) $\endgroup$ – iago-lito Feb 15 '17 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelMcGovern okay, so this is just a way to write that the integral is computed using the product measure $\mu\otimes\nu$ over $A\times B$ without loss of generality concerning the form and nature of $A,\ B,\ \mu$ and $\nu$, right? In trivial cases, it may just read as $\int_{A\times B}{\Phi(a, b)\, \mu(a)\, \nu(b)\ \mathrm{d}a\,\mathrm{d}b}$.. $\endgroup$ – iago-lito Feb 15 '17 at 18:01
1
$\begingroup$

I assume $\mu$ and $\nu$ are distributions with $d\mu$ and $d\nu$ the corresponding measures. Then $d\mu\otimes d\nu$ denotes the product measure. Distributions $\mu$ can be seen as generalised functions, where $\mu(x)$ doesn't have to be defined. However, I think in your case $\mu$ and $\nu$ are just functions, so you may write $\mu(x)$ and $\nu(y)$. In this case $d\mu(x)=\mu(x)dx$, and the product measure becomes simply $$(d\mu\otimes d\nu)(a,b)=\mu(a)\nu(b)dadb\,.$$ Now, to be (overly) precise, the author actually meant to write $$\tilde{\Phi}:=\int_{A\times B}\Phi(a,b)(d\mu\otimes d\nu)(a,b)\,,$$ but he assumed that it was clear that $a$ and $b$ are integrated over. So when $\mu$ and $\nu$ are functions, you have $$\tilde{\Phi}=\int_{A\times B}\Phi(a,b)\mu(a)\nu(b)dadb\,.$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.