1
$\begingroup$

Let M be a smooth manifold. Suppose that $f : M \to M$ is a smooth involution without fixed points, i.e. for all points $x \in M$ the conditions $f^2(x) = x$ and $f(x) \ne x$ are satisfied. Define an equivalence relation on M by $x ∼ y \Leftrightarrow x = f^k(y)$ for some $k \in \mathbb{Z}$. I want to show that the associated quotient space $M/∼$ naturally inherits the structure of a smooth manifold such that the projection $ \pi : M \to M/∼ $ is smooth.

Given an atlas $\{U_\alpha, \phi_\alpha\}_{\alpha \in \mathcal{I}}$ of $M$, choosing symmetrized neighborhoods (that is restricting the size of each $U_\alpha$ such that $U_\alpha \cap f(U_\alpha)= \emptyset$, assuming that can be done), one can construct an atlas for $M/∼$ by considering the covering $ \{ V_\alpha = \pi(U_\alpha), \psi_\alpha = \phi_\alpha \circ (\pi |_{U_\alpha})^{-1} \}_{\alpha \in \mathcal{I}} $ which is obviously a smooth atlas on $M/∼$.

$M/∼$ is compact and connected because M is compact and connected. But I am not sure how to prove Hausdorffness. Moreover, I am not totally convinced that I can always have a choice of symmetrized neighborhoods.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

First, pick an arbitrary Riemannian metric $\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle _1$ and define a new Riemainnian metric $\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle = \langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle_1 + f^\ast \langle \cdot,\cdot \rangle_1$. Then by construction, $\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle$ is $f$ invariant. Said another way, $f$ is an isometry with respect to this metric.

Now, let's show you can always find a symmetrizing neighborhood. So, let $x\in M$ and set $d = d(x,f(x)) > 0$. Consider the ball $B = B(x, d/2)$ of radius $d/2$ around $x$. Since $f$ is an isometry, $f(B) = B(f(x), d/2)$. We claim that $B$ is a symmetrizing neighborhood. (If it's not a chart, intersect it with a chart, giving a symmetrizing neighborhood).

To see this, assume for a contradiction that there is a $y\in B\cap f(B)$. Then $$d = d(x,f(x)) \leq d(x,y) + d(y, f(x) < d/2 + d/2 = d,$$ so $d < d$.

$\ $

I'll leave the Hausdorff condition to you, but as a hint, for $x$ distinct from both $y$ and $f(y)$, let $d = \min\{d(x,y), d(x,f(y)\}$, and consider $U = B(x,d/2)\cup B(f(x),d/2)$ and $V = B(y,d/2)\cup B(f(y), d/2)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by $d(x,y)$? M is not a metric space. Moreover, a Riemannian metric cannot compute distances between points in the manifold. $\endgroup$ – Nanashi No Gombe Feb 14 '17 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ A Riemannian metric allows you to compute the distance between two points (on a connected manifold) as $d(x,y) = \inf \int_0^1 |\gamma| dt$ where the infimum is taken over all (piecewise) smooth $\gamma:[0,1]\rightarrow M$ with $\gamma(0) = x$ and $\gamma(1) = y$. (If $M$ is compact, as it seems you assume later on, then the infimum is always achieved. This is one consequence of the Hopf-Rinow Theorem). $\endgroup$ – Jason DeVito Feb 14 '17 at 18:34
  • $\begingroup$ I see. But, you mean $d(x,y) = \inf \int_0^1 |\dot{\gamma}| dt$, right? $\endgroup$ – Nanashi No Gombe Feb 14 '17 at 18:39
  • $\begingroup$ Yes - I forgot my derivative. $\endgroup$ – Jason DeVito Feb 14 '17 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, I understand your proof. However, can we have an alternative proof where we do not have to assume a Riemannian structure, because the claim holds regardless? $\endgroup$ – Nanashi No Gombe Feb 14 '17 at 18:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.