6
$\begingroup$

I can see why it is true by writing out some examples, but I'm not sure how one could prove that, with $\left({\cdot\over p}\right)$ as the mod $p$ Legendre symbol

$$\sum_{x=1}^{p-1} \left(\frac{x(x-1)}{p}\right)=-1$$

For example, for $p=5$

$(2/5)+(1/5)+(2/5)=-1$

But could it be shown just from the sum itself?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Every $x\in[1,p-1]$ is invertible $\!\!\pmod{p}$ and if we denote with $x^{-1}$ its inverse we have:

$$ \sum_{x=1}^{p-1}\left(\frac{x(x-1)}{p}\right) = \sum_{x=1}^{p-1}\left(\frac{x^{-1}}{p}\right)\left(\frac{x-1}{p}\right) = \sum_{x=1}^{p-1}\left(\frac{1-x^{-1}}{p}\right)=\sum_{y=1}^{p-1}\left(\frac{1-y}{p}\right) $$ that is just $$ \left(\frac{0}{p}\right)+\sum_{z=2}^{p-1}\left(\frac{z}{p}\right) = -\left(\frac{1}{p}\right)+\sum_{z=1}^{p-1}\left(\frac{z}{p}\right) = -1 $$ as wanted.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

For $p$ prime $\chi(n) = (\frac{n}{p})$ is a non-principal Dirichlet character $\bmod p$.

Since for $gcd(k,p ) = 1$ : $$\sum_{n=1}^p \chi(n) e^{-2i \pi nk/p} = \overline{\chi(k)} \sum_{n=1}^p \chi(nk) e^{-2i \pi nk/p}=\overline{\chi(k)}\sum_{n=1}^p \chi(n) e^{-2i \pi n/p}$$ we have that its discrete Fourier transform is $\hat{\chi}(k) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{p}}\sum_{n=1}^p \chi(n) e^{-2i \pi nk/p}= \overline{\chi(k)}G(\chi)$ where $G(\chi) = \hat{\chi}(1)$ and $|G(\chi)| = 1$.

Using that the DFT of $\chi(n-1)$ is $\hat{\chi}(k) e^{-2i \pi k/p}$ and the unitary-ness of the DFT : $$\sum_{n=1}^p \chi(n) \overline{\chi(n-1)} = \sum_{k=1}^p \hat{\chi}(k)\overline{\hat{\chi}(k)} e^{2i \pi k/p} = |G(\chi)|^2 \sum_{k=1}^p |\chi(k)|^2 e^{2i \pi k/p}=\sum_{k=1}^{p-1} e^{2i \pi k/p}= -1$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand what happens when $\chi(n)$ is the trivial character. Can you find the mistake ? $\endgroup$ – reuns Feb 13 '17 at 0:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.