2
$\begingroup$

$A = \{1/n:n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ and $B =A \cup \{0\}$.

$A$ and $B$ are subsets of $\mathbb{R}$, with Euclidean metric.

  1. Does a continuous bijection exist $f:A \rightarrow B$?

  2. Does a continuous bijection exist $f:B \rightarrow A$?

I can easily find bijections between $A$ and $B$ but none that are continuous. Intuitively, I feel like this is not possible, but how can I prove it? I also realize that $B$ is the closure of $A$, does that have any impact?

One approach I can think of is that if 1 AND 2 are true, then $A$ and $B$ are homeomorphic, but that is not possible, by the invariance theorem, since $B$ is closed while $A$ is not. But this does not preclude either 1 or 2 being true.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Though $A$ is not closed, it's also not open. Your point that $A$ and $B$ are not homeomorphic to each other still stands, though. $\endgroup$ – 211792 Feb 11 '17 at 1:25
  • $\begingroup$ RIght, that makes sense. Edited. $\endgroup$ – jackson5 Feb 11 '17 at 1:29
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Do you know a theorem about a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space? $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Feb 11 '17 at 1:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Strictly speaking the question is not well-posed: you haven't told us what topologies you're using on the bare sets $A$ and $B$. If you're using the subspace topology induced by the usual topology on the reals, you should note that $A$ is a discrete space. What does this tell you about the answer to question 1? $\endgroup$ – symplectomorphic Feb 11 '17 at 2:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Also, you have made a subtle error in your reasoning that "yes" answers to both 1 and 2 jointly imply that $A$ and $B$ are homeomorphic. Just because there is a continuous objection in both directions does not mean there is a single bijection that is continuous in both directions. Indeed, there are counterexamples: see mathoverflow.net/questions/30661/… $\endgroup$ – symplectomorphic Feb 11 '17 at 2:19
3
$\begingroup$
  1. Yes, because there is an obvious bijection $A\to B$ and $A$ is discrete. (Discreteness implies every function out of $A$ is continuous.)

  2. No, because $B$ is compact and $A$ is Hausdorff, so a positive answer would imply $A$ and $B$ are homeomorphic. This can't be right because $A$ is discrete but $B$ is not, and discreteness is a topological property.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.