0
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be the vector space and $W_1, W_2, W_3$ are the subspaces in $V$. Decide, if $(W_1 \lor W_2) \cap W_3 = W_1 \lor (W_2 \cap W_3)$.

I think it isn't right.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have more information about the subspaces? Are the orthogonal to each other, for example? $\endgroup$ – Brick Feb 7 '17 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ No, unfortunately. They are arbitrary. It is from basic linear algebra book. $\endgroup$ – Leif Feb 7 '17 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ The "subspaces" that you've defined are not spaces at all, at least not for arbitrary vectors $w_i$. Each subspace should include the origin, for example. $\endgroup$ – Brick Feb 7 '17 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ It's quite rare that a subspace contains just one vector. $\endgroup$ – egreg Feb 7 '17 at 20:48
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it was a nonsense, so I deleted it, but I think I came up with the answer. $\endgroup$ – Leif Feb 7 '17 at 20:50
0
$\begingroup$

I think I came up with the solution, I found the contradiction.

If $W_1, W_2, W_3$ are the subspace and their direct sum exists, then

$ W_3 \cap (W_1 \lor W_2) = 0$ by definition,

and because we are working with direct sum, $W_2 \cap W_3$ = 0, but

$W_1 \lor (W_2 \cap W_3) \neq 0$ if $W_1\neq \{0\}$

So that is the contradiction.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I need a contradiction so I assume that none of my subspaces intersects with another, hence direct sum exists. $\endgroup$ – Leif Feb 7 '17 at 22:14
0
$\begingroup$

The equality is not true in general, but not for the reason you give.

A subspace consists of a single vector only if it is $\{0\}$. If you want to find a good counterexample, your idea is nonetheless good.

Suppose $\{w_1,w_2,w_3\}$ is a linearly independent set and let $W_i=\langle w_i\rangle$, for $i=1,2,3$.

Then it's easy to see that $(W_1\vee W_2)\cap W_3=\{0\}$, whereas $W_1\vee(W_2\cap W_3)=W_1$.

Note that $W_1\vee W_2$ consists of all linear combinations of the form $\alpha_1w_1+\alpha_2w_2$. On the other hand, if $v=\alpha_1w_1+\alpha_2w_2=\alpha_3w_3\in(W_1\vee W_2)\cap W_3$, then $$ \alpha_1w_1+\alpha_2w_2-\alpha_3w_3=0 $$ so $\alpha_1=\alpha_2=\alpha_3=0$ and $v=0$.

Prove similarly that $W_2\cap W_3=\{0\}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.