-1
$\begingroup$

If $\text{span } \{v_1, v_2\} = \text{span } \{w\}$ then the set $\{v_1, v_2\}$ is linearly dependent. [vectors]

It must follow that $w = v_1$ or $w = v_2$. Thus in the first case we have $c_3v_1 = c_1v_1 + c_2v_2$, contradiction.

Is this enough?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The first sentence of your argument is invalid. Given non-unit scalars $\alpha_1,\alpha_2$, we can have $v_1=\alpha_1w$, $v_2=\alpha_2w$, and the hypothesis of the statement are obeyed. $\endgroup$ – Aweygan Feb 5 '17 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ by contradiction, if $\{v_1,v_2\}$ is lin. ind. we have that $\{v_1,v_2\}$ ist basis for $span(\{w\})$, therefore $dim_K(span(\{w\}))=2$... $\endgroup$ – mle Feb 5 '17 at 22:10
1
$\begingroup$

$ v_1=a_1 w , v_2 = a_2 w$. $ a_2 v_1 + (-a_1)v_2 = 0 $

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ One should add the case when $a_1=a_2=0$, but it's easy. $\endgroup$ – egreg Feb 5 '17 at 21:41
0
$\begingroup$

The span of $\{v_1,v_2\}$ certainly contains $v_1$ and $v_2$, so if $\operatorname{span}\{v_1,v_2\} = \operatorname{span}\{w\}$, then there are scalars $a_1$ and $a_2$ such that $$a_1w=v_1 \;\text{and}\; a_2w=v_2\,.$$ Or to say this another way $$w=\frac{1}{a_1}v_1 \;\text{and}\; w=\frac{1}{a_2}v_2\,.$$

But then we have $$\frac{1}{a_1}v_1 - \frac{1}{a_2}v_2 = 0\,,$$ which is a problem.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.