5
$\begingroup$

I want find the polynomials which satisfy the condition $$f(x)\mid f(x^2).$$

I want to find such polynomials with integer coefficients, real number coefficients and complex number coefficients.

For example, $x$ and $x-1$ are the linear polynomials which satisfy this condition.

Here is one way to find the $2$-degree polynomials with integer coefficients. Let the quadratic be $p=ax^2+bx+c$, so its value at $x^2$ is $q=ax^4+bx^2+c$. If $p$ is to be a divisor of $q$ let the other factor be $dx^2+ex+f.$ Equating coefficients gives equations

[1] $ad=a,$

[2] $ae+bd=0,$

[3] $af+be+cd=b,$

[4] $bf+ce=0,$

[5] $cf=c.$

Now we know $a,c$ are nonzero (else $p$ is not quadratic, or is reducible). So from [1] and [5] we have $d=f=1.$ Then from [2] and [4] we obtain $ae=ce.$ Here $e=0$ leads to $b=0$ from either [2] or [4], and [3] then reads $a+c=0$, so that $p=a(x^2-1)$ which is reducible. So we may assume $e$ is nonzero, and also $a=c.$

At this point, [2] and [4] say the same thing, namely $ae+b=0.$ So we may replace $b=-ae$ in [3] (with its $c$ replaced by $a$) obtaining $a+(-ae)e+a=-ae,$ which on factoring gives $a(2-e)(e+1)=0.$ The possibility $e=2$ then leads after some algebra to $2a+b=0$ and $p=a(x-1)^2$ which is reducible, while the possibility $e=-1$ leads to $a=b$ and then $p=ax^2+ax+a$ as claimed.

Should we list out all the irreducible degree polynomials and then check if these polynomials satisfy the condition

  • $x$
  • $x+1$
  • $x^2 + x + 1$
  • $x^3 + x^2 + 1$
  • $x^3 + x + 1$
  • $ x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1 $
  • $ x^4 + x^3 + 1 $
  • $ x^4 + x + 1 $

With the real number coefficients which can be factored into

$$(x-c_1)(x-c_2)\cdots(x^2-2a_1x-(a_1^2+b_1^2))(x^2-2a_2x-(a_2^2+b_2^2))\cdots$$ If all of these linear terms and quadratic terms satisfy $$f(x)\mid f(x^2),$$ this polynomial satisfy too? So what's pattern in the real number polynomials?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I imagine you want to represent polynomials by their sets of roots rather than by their coefficients. Incidentally, if $f(x) | f(x^2)$, then $(-1)^n a f(x^2) = f(x) f(-x)$, where $a$ is the leading coefficient of $f$ and $n$ its degree. $\endgroup$ – user14972 Feb 4 '17 at 3:09
  • $\begingroup$ can you give me a proof? I can hardly understand you $\endgroup$ – Mclalalala Feb 4 '17 at 3:12
  • $\begingroup$ Hrm. Actually, the easy argument I had in mind only concludes $\operatorname{lcm}(f(x), f(-x)) \mid f(x^2)$. I still think what I wrote is true, but am no longer certain. $\endgroup$ – user14972 Feb 4 '17 at 3:34
3
$\begingroup$

The polynomials with $f(x)\mid f(x^2)$ are closed under multiplication. In fact, if $f$ is any such polynomial and $g(x)\mid f(x^2)/f(x)$, then $f(x)g(x)$ is also such a polynomial.

WLOG assume $x\nmid f(x)$. The relation $f(x)\mid f(x^2)$ implies

$$ \{\alpha:f(\alpha)=0\}\subseteq \{\beta:f(\beta^2)=0\}=\{\pm\sqrt{\beta}:f(\beta)=0\}.$$

Let $\alpha$ be a zero. Then $\alpha=\pm\sqrt{\beta}$ for some other zero $\beta$, or equivalently $\alpha^2=\beta$. Put another way, the square of any zero is also a zero, so the set of zeros is closed under squaring. Therefore we have a sequence of zeros $\alpha,\alpha^2,\alpha^4,\cdots$ which must eventually terminate since $f$ has finitely many zeros, in which case $\alpha^{2^n}=\alpha^{2^m}$ eventually, so $\alpha^{2^r(2^s-1)}=1$ and thus $\alpha$ is a root of unity.

We can restrict our attention to $f$ that cannot be written as a nontrivial product of other polynomials with this property. I don't think there's a very nice characterization of the possible set of zeros of $f$ beyond "start with a root of unity and keep squaring until you get a repeat." For example, over $\mathbb{C}$ we have that $f(x)=(x-i)(x+1)(x-1)$ is such a polynomial; it includes a kind of "cycle" of length two $\{-1,1\}$ in its zero set, but it also has a kind of "hangnail" at the front, namely $i$. If we think about this in terms of integers mod $n$, we can write $n=2^km$ and use the Chinese Remainder Theorem to track what $x\mapsto 2x$ does to an integer mod $n$; the sequence is eventually periodic but at the beginning the $\mathbb{Z}/2^k\mathbb{Z}$ coordinate may be nonzero.

To get the $f$ with real coefficients, just make sure the set $\{\alpha,\alpha^2,\alpha^4\cdots\}$ is closed under conjugation; if it isn't, then adjoin all their conjugates to construct an $f$ with real coefficients.

And to get $f$ with integer coefficients, if $f$ has an $n$th root of unity as a zero then $f$ is divisible by the cyclotomic polynomial $\Phi_n(x)$. If $n$ is even, then squaring primitive $2n$th roots of unity yield primitive $n$th roots of unity, meaning both $\Phi_{n}(x)$ and $\Phi_{n/2}(x)$ are factors. Writing $n=2^km$, this means it is divisible by $\Phi_{2^km}(x)\Phi_{2^{k-1}m}(x)\cdots\Phi_m(x)$. One can check these polynomials satisfy the condition.

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Pertinent information should be added to the post itself via an edit. $\endgroup$ – user642796 Mar 3 '17 at 5:54
  • $\begingroup$ $\alpha^{2^n}=\alpha^{2^m}$ then $\alpha^{2^n-2^m}=1$ and we can factor $2^n-2^m=2^r(2^s-1)$ for some $r,s$. $\endgroup$ – Mclalalala Mar 3 '17 at 6:36
  • $\begingroup$ @arctic tern why from this we can conclude that $\alpha$ was a root of unity $\endgroup$ – Mclalalala Mar 3 '17 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ If $\alpha$ raised to an integer power equals $1$, then $\alpha$ is a root of unity. That's, like, the definition of "root of unity." $\endgroup$ – Mclalalala Mar 3 '17 at 13:37
  • $\begingroup$ I already gave every possible example. The only monic irreducible integer-coefficient polynomials $f(x)$ such that $f(x)\mid f(x^2)$ are cyclotomic polynomials $\Phi_m(x)$ where $m$ is odd. Since $\deg\Phi_m(x)=\phi(m)$ and $\phi(m)$ is never $3$, there are no examples of degree $3$. As for degree $4$, the only odd solution to $\phi(m)=4$ is $m=5$, so the unique polynomial $f(x)$ is $\Phi_5(x)=x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$. $\endgroup$ – Mclalalala Mar 3 '17 at 14:37
2
$\begingroup$

I don't have "the answer" per se, but I think I can provide a new perspective on it.

Let's work over the complex numbers $\mathbb{C}$. That way, we can write every polynomial as the product of its roots, i.e. in the form $f(x) = (x - r_1)^{e_1}...(x - r_n)^{e_n}$ for distinct $r_1, ... , r_n \in \mathbb{C}$.

Let's first deal with the case of $n=1$, where again, $n$ is the number of distinct roots of $f$. Then $f(x^2) = (x^2 - r_1)^{e_1} = (x - \sqrt{r_1})^{e_1}(x + \sqrt{r_1})^{e_1}$. Therefore since $r_1$ has to be a root of $f(x^2)$ if $f(x) | f(x^2)$, then $r_1 = \pm \sqrt{r_1}$ so $r_1 = 0$ or $r_1 = 1$.

How about two roots? Let's call them $r$ and $s$. Then similarly either $r = \pm \sqrt{r}$ or $r = \pm \sqrt{s}$, and either $s = \pm \sqrt{r}$ or $s = \pm \sqrt{s}$. The only interesting case is if $r = \pm \sqrt{s}$ and $s = \pm \sqrt{r}$. But then $r^2 = s = \pm \sqrt{r}$ so $r^4 - r = 0$, so $r \in \{0, 1, \omega, \omega^2\}$, where $\omega$ is a primitive third root of unity. Similarly $s \in \{0, 1, \omega, \omega^2\}$. By only going after the "new" case, we see that the only choice is to have one of the roots be $\omega$ and the other $\omega^2$. So an obvious candidate is $(x - \omega)(x - \omega^2) = x^2 + x + 1$, which holds since $\omega^2 = -\omega$.

I think it's possible to continue this way, and in particular I think it wouldn't be so hard to show any nonzero solution has complex norm 1.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.