Simple way of doing logarithms without a calculator I'm a Year 12 Specialist Mathematics student currently studying logarithms. In class we constantly use the calculators for logarithms. does any-body have a simple way of doing logarithms without a calculator or log-book?  
For instance a simple one like $$\log_{3}22=x$$
How would I solve for $x$?
 A: In general there is no way to compute logarithms exactly without either using a computing device or hours of pen and paper calculations.
You case is further complicated by the fact that the base of the logarithm is not $e$. In other words, you example is not a "simple one". However, you can do something to simplify it:
$$\log_{3}22=\log_{3}(27-5)=3+\log_{3} \left(1-\frac{5}{27} \right)$$
(Remember, $27=3^3$). Because for $|t| \to 0$ we have $\log(1+t) \approx  t$, we can conclude that $x \approx 3$, but $x<3$. The numerical value is about $2.8135880922155955$.
If you want, you can use the infinite series for $\log(1+t)$, however, you need to remember that in your case the change of base is necessary:
$$\log_{3} \left(1-\frac{5}{27} \right) = \frac{1}{\log 3} \log \left(1-\frac{5}{27} \right)=-\frac{1}{\log 3} \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{5^k}{k 27^k}$$
So, even to find an approximation by truncating the series for some finite $N$ (i.e.  $\sum_{k=1}^N \frac{5^k}{k 27^k}$), you first need to compute $\log 3$ with high precision.
There are many ways to compute approximate values of logarithms (and calculators of course use some of them too), but they all involve long and difficult calculations.
I highly recommend the book Analysis by Its History , I think in the first chapter they have a long discussion about how people were computing logarithms in $18-19$th centuries, and how it lead to the development of modern methods.
Logarithms were extremely important for navigation at the time, so every ship had a logarithm table. And there were few people who could create these tables.
