I defined the tangent space $T_xX$ of a manifold $X$ at a point $x \in X$ as the equivalence class of curves $c: (-\varepsilon, \varepsilon) \to X$ such that $c(0) =x$ and $c_1 \sim c_2$ if $(\varphi \circ c_1)'(0) = (\varphi \circ c_2)'(0)$ for a chart $(U, \varphi)$with $x \in U$. I know that $T_xX$ has the structure of a vector space.

Now my question: Is there a way to view $T_xX$ as a manifold itself? If yes, how do the charts look like?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Test123 So the answer would be yes and the charts are global i.e. $(\mathbb{R}^n, Id)$? $\endgroup$ – JDoe Feb 1 '17 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ The tangent space at a point topologically is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^n$ let's say via $\phi$. There will be one chart $(\mathbb{R}^n,\phi)$. $\endgroup$ – Kal S. Feb 1 '17 at 12:57

If your manifold has dimension $n$, then $T_xX$ is a vector space of dimension $n$, and vector spaces can always be given a manifold structure (of dimension $n$).

However, what you'll see (and probably find more interesting) if you keep studying is that we can define the "tangent bundle":

$$TX=\coprod_{x\in X}T_x X$$

which can be given the structure of a $2n$-dimensional manifold. You can find this in any book on smooth manifolds; I personally like John M. Lee's book.

Edit: If $V$ is an $n$-dimensional vector space over $\Bbb{R}$, it is a fact that any norm on $V$ determines a topology, which is independent of the norm. Therefore $V$ has a natural topology on it, and any vector space isomorphism $\varphi:V\to\Bbb{R}^n$ actually turns out to be a homeomorphism as well, so $\varphi$ determines a smooth chart for all of $V$.

  • $\begingroup$ I see. Where can I find the result that a vector space can be give n a manifold structure? $\endgroup$ – JDoe Feb 1 '17 at 12:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Lee's book, example 1.24. I'll summarize the argument above in a moment $\endgroup$ – Alex Mathers Feb 1 '17 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ Alex Mathers, do we need norm? I know only a little functional analysis, but I know inner product implies norm implies metric space. From elementary topology, metric is enough to imply a topology. Is norm used in manifold aspects besides the topology of the manifold such as the smooth/differentiable atlas? I skimmed in Example 1.24 of Lee and did not see any particular reason to use norm. $\endgroup$ – user636532 Apr 17 at 11:04
  • $\begingroup$ Also, are finite real vector space isomorphisms diffeomorphisms just as they are homeomorphisms? $\endgroup$ – user636532 Apr 17 at 11:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.