1
$\begingroup$

I'm having some trouble finishing this exercise:

Suppose $A : X \rightarrow X$ is a bounded linear operator on a Banach space $X$. Show that, if $A^*(X^*) = X^*$, then $A$ has a bounded inverse. (Bachman, Functional Analysis, Exercise 17.7)

(Here $X^*$ denotes de dual space of $X$, and $A^*$ the adjoint operator associated to $A$)

Now, given the fact that $X$ is Banach, we can use the bounded inverse theorem to show that if $A$ admits an inverse then it must be bounded. So the problem reduces to showing that $A$ is injective and surjective.

I have already shown that $A$ must be injective. But I am having problems showing that it must be surjective. If I can show that $A(X)$ is closed and $A^*$ is injective then I can prove the surjectivity of $A$, but I'm doubting that all of this has to be a consequence of just $A^*$ being surjective.

Does anyone have any hint?

Thanks in advance :)

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

It seems just false to me. Consider $A$ equal to right shift in $\ell^2$, that is, $(a_1,a_2,\dots)\mapsto(0,a_1,a_2,\dots)$. Its adjoint is the left shift in $\ell^2\cong(\ell^2)^*$ (identifying by the usual scalar multiplication) which is surjective.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Under the given restrictions, you can show that $A$ is injective and has a closed range, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_range_theorem.

You cannot show surjectivity of $A$ since this would imply that $A^*$ is injective, and this may not be true.

In fact, any $A$ which is injective and has a closed range has a surjective adjoint.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.