1
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have two sets of linearly independent vectors: $$\{\vec{u_1},\ldots,\vec{u_k}\},\{\vec{v_1},\ldots,\vec{v_{n-k}}\}$$ such that they span two mutually orthogonal hyper-planes. (i.e. $\vec{u_i}\cdot\vec{v_j}=0$ for all $i,j$) and also span $\mathbb{R}^n$

Then we can write any $\vec{x}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ with a change of basis $$\vec{x}=a_1\vec{u_1}+\cdots+a_k\vec{u_k}+b_1\vec{v_1}+\cdots+b_{n-k}\vec{v_{n-k}}$$

Or equivalently $$\vec{x}=U\vec{a}+V\vec{b}$$ where $U$ is $n\times k$, $V$ is $n\times n-k$, $\vec{a}=(a_1,\ldots,a_k)$, and $\vec{b}=(b_1,\ldots,b_{n-k})$

My question is given a full-rank linear transformation $T$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$, can $T$ always be split into two transformations on the hyper-planes spanned by $\{\vec{u_1},\ldots,\vec{u_k}\}$ and $\{\vec{v_1},\ldots,\vec{v_{n-k}}\}$? Specifically will there exist transformations $S, T$ such that $$T\vec{x}=U(R\vec{a})+V(S\vec{b})$$

Also will $S,T$ be linear? and how could you find them given an actual matrix?

Maybe for an example? $$ T= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$$ Where the hyper-planes are respectively the one spanned by the eigenvectors and that which is all vectors orthogonal to the eigenvectors. $$\{\vec{u_1}, \vec{u_2}\}\approx\{(.40,.32,.25,1),(-.75,1.12,-1.67,1)\}$$

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If I understand your question correctly (let me know otherwise), you are asking whether, given a basis $v_1,\ldots,v_n,w_1,\ldots,w_m$ with $v_i\cdot w_j=0$ for every $i,j$, and a linear transformation $T:U\to U,$ we can decompose $T$ as a sum $T=T_1\oplus T_2$, so that $T(u+w)=T_1u+T_2w$ for every $u\in V=\text{span}\{v_1,\ldots,v_n\}$ and $w\in W=\text{span}\{w_1,\ldots,w_m\}$.

The answer is then no. Here is the classic example. Consider the two dimensional vector space over $\mathbb R$ with basis $(0,1),(1,0)$, then the linear transformation $T=\begin{bmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{bmatrix}$ is not diagonalizable, so does not decompose as a sum $T_1\oplus T_2$.

Edit: In order for $T$ to be expressed as a direct sum of linear transformations on $V$ and $W$, it must be invariant on $V$ and $W$, ie. $Tv\in V$ and $Tw\in W$ for every $v\in V$, $w\in W$. For example, the linear transformation $T=\begin{bmatrix}1&1&0&0\\0&5&0&0\\0&0&1&2\\0&0&3&4\end{bmatrix}$ has the invariant subspaces $V=\text{span}\{(1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0)\}$ and $W=\text{span}\{(0,0,1,0),(0,0,0,1)\}$ (orthogonal to each other with the standard inner product). In particular, $T$ decomposes if and only if its matrix is made up of matrix blocks along the diagonal, ie. $T=\begin{bmatrix}A&0\\0&B\end{bmatrix}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Being diagonalizable is equivalent to being expressible as $T_1$ and $T_2$? $\endgroup$ – Christian Woll Jan 28 '17 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianWoll If the vector space is two dimensional, yes, but not in general. See my edit. $\endgroup$ – Couchy311 Jan 28 '17 at 21:50
  • $\begingroup$ there should be $v_i\cdot w_j$ in the second line. $\endgroup$ – Dmitry Jan 30 '17 at 13:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.