0
$\begingroup$

Let $f:\Bbb R\to \Bbb R$ be defined by

$f(x)$=\begin{cases} \frac{1}{\sqrt x};\text{$0<x<1$}\\ 0;\text{else} \end{cases}

Define $g:\Bbb R\to \Bbb R$ by $g(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{2^n}f(x-r_n)$ where $\{r_n\}_n$ is an enumeration of rationals in $\Bbb R$.

Show that $f,g$ is integrable.

Since $f$ is unbounded we need to talk about Lebesgue-Integrability here.

Now $\int f=2\sqrt x|_0^1=2<\infty \implies f$ is Lebesgue Integrable.

I am unable to show this for $g$. Any help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why do we need to talk about Lebesgue integrability? $f$ is Riemann Integrable imo. As you did, you took the limit for $r \to 0$ of the Riemann Integrals in $(r,1)$. $\endgroup$ – Maffred Jan 27 '17 at 3:40
  • $\begingroup$ But $f$ is not bounded ? As $x\to 0\implies f(x)\to \infty$ $\endgroup$ – Learnmore Jan 27 '17 at 3:48
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think this is a problem becuase you integrate in $[R,1]$ and then take the limit. $\endgroup$ – Maffred Jan 27 '17 at 4:25
  • $\begingroup$ "Lebesgue's integrability has nothing to do with the Lebesgue integral" cit wikipedia, my bad! :) You can call it this way if you please. $\endgroup$ – Maffred Jan 27 '17 at 4:29
1
$\begingroup$

Use Tonelli: For non negative measurable $g_n$, we have $\int \sum_n g_n = \sum_n \int g_n $, so if we let $g_n(x) = {1 \over 2^n} f(x-r_n)$, we see that $\int g = \int \sum_n g_n = \sum_n \int g_n = \sum_n 2 {1 \over 2^n} < \infty$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is Tonelli? $\endgroup$ – Learnmore Jan 27 '17 at 3:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A powerful alcoholic drink. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fubini's_theorem. I will see if I can get a more apropos link. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jan 27 '17 at 3:49
  • $\begingroup$ @copper.hat Is this not a consequence of monotone convergence? $\endgroup$ – Math1000 Jan 27 '17 at 3:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Math1000: Yes, that would be one way of doing it. I was thinking of interchanging the order of integration (using the counting measure for one), but the monotone convergence theorem would be more straightforward. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jan 27 '17 at 3:56
  • $\begingroup$ @copper.hat; I don't know about Tonelli nor could I understand it from Wiki;Is it possible to do it in some other easier way $\endgroup$ – Learnmore Jan 27 '17 at 15:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.