2
$\begingroup$

$p$ can be any polynomial and the matrices are square matrices

Now I know that by the Cayley–Hamilton theorem any matrice A satisfies it's characteristic polynomial and I feel that the key to the proof lies there, but not sure how to capitalize on it.

My guess is since $A$ and $B$ are similar they have the same $p(\lambda)$ so doesn't that imply (by what was stated earlier) that the matrices $p(A)$ and $p(B)$ are similar?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "are of quadratic form" ? That they are symmetric ? $\endgroup$ – Jean Marie Jan 26 '17 at 13:07
  • $\begingroup$ I mean that their dimension is n x n $\endgroup$ – adadaae12313412 Jan 26 '17 at 13:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I understand ! Instead of quadratic, you should use the term "square". $\endgroup$ – Jean Marie Jan 26 '17 at 13:19
9
$\begingroup$

Let $p(x) = \sum_{k=0}^n a_kx^k$.

If $A, B$ are similar, there is an invertible $S$ such that $B = SAS^{-1}$.

Let $p(A) = P$.

What is $p(B)$ ?

$$p(B) = \sum_{k=0}^n a_kB^k = \sum_{k=0}^n a_k(SAS^{-1})^k = \\ \sum_{k=0}^n a_kSA^kS^{-1} = S\left(\sum_{k=0}^n a_kA^k\right)S^{-1} = Sp(A)S^{-1} = SPS^{-1}$$

and the matrices are similar.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This doesn't answer the question. p is any polynomial. $\endgroup$ – Igor D. Jan 26 '17 at 13:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @IgorD. I had written $0$ instead of $P$ by mistake. Corrected it now. $\endgroup$ – RGS Jan 26 '17 at 13:08
3
$\begingroup$

$A$ is similar to $B$, i.e., there exists $T$ non singular matrix such that $$ A = T^{-1}BT.$$ Let $p(\lambda) = a_n \lambda^n + \dots + a_1 \lambda + a_0.$ Thus $$ \begin{array}[rcl]~p(A) &=& a_n A^n + \dots + a_1 A + a_0 I \\ &=& a_n (T^{-1}BT)^n + \dots + a_1 T^{-1}BT + a_0 T^{-1}T \\ &=& a_n T^{-1}B^nT + \dots + a_1 T^{-1}BT + a_0 T^{-1}T \\ &=& T^{-1}\bigg( a_n B^n + \dots + a_1 B + a_0 I \bigg) T \\ &=& T^{-1}p(B) T. \end{array} $$ Hence $p(B)$ and $p(A)$ are also similar.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The usage of $\lambda$ here may be misleading, given that one usually uses it as a letter for the eigenvalues, and not for the independent variable of a generic polynomial. $\endgroup$ – RGS Jan 26 '17 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ Inexperienced mathematicians may become confused because of that. $\endgroup$ – RGS Jan 26 '17 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ I see your point! But I tried to use the same notation used in the question. $\endgroup$ – Igor D. Jan 26 '17 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but the $p(\lambda)$ the OP talks about is the characteristic polynomial, not a generic one. And the characteristic polynomial is often written using $\lambda$ as the variable. Thus, your polynomial may be mistaken by a characteristic polynomial of some matrix. $\endgroup$ – RGS Jan 26 '17 at 13:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.