So I have the following question:
$Let \\ u_1 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3\sqrt{2}}\\\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2}}\\\frac{-4}{3\sqrt{2}}\end{pmatrix} u_2 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{2}{3}\\\frac{2}{3}\\\frac{1}{3}\end{pmatrix} u_3 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\\frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}}\\0\end{pmatrix}\\$

(a)Show that $\{u_1, u_2, u_3\}$ is an orthonormal basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$

I know that I simply find the magnitude of all the vectors and if they are 1 then they are of unit length and meet 1 of 2 criterion for being a orthonormal basis. The next thing is take the dot product and if it's 0 then it's orthogonal. The question i have is do I take 3 diferrent dot products like:
$u_1\cdot u_2, u_1\cdot u_3, u_2\cdot u_3$

And if all of them are 0 then the set if a orthonormal basis. Or am I supposed to take the dot product of all three at once (is that even possible), like:
$u_1\cdot u_2\cdot u_3$

  • $\begingroup$ What is the definition of an orthogonal set of vectors that you are using? $\endgroup$ – wj32 Oct 11 '12 at 23:39

Yes you have to take three dot products. Another way of checking would be computing (with $A= (u_1,u_2,u_3)$) $$A A^T$$ if this equals the identity matrix, you have an orthonormal base(because $A$ being an othogonal matrix is equal to $\{u_1,u_2,u_3\}$ being a ONB).

The dot product of all three at once is not defined, because the dot product is a map, that maps two vectors to a real number. So after performing the first dot product, the term you have left would be undefined.

  • $\begingroup$ ah okay that makes sense, thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – Charlie Yabben Oct 11 '12 at 23:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.