0
$\begingroup$

I was reading simple random sample without replacement.

Now, they are computing the $Var(\bar{X})$, where $\bar{X}=1/n \sum(X_i)$ and $X_i$ is the sample.

Going back to $Var(\bar{X})$.

They formulate as

$Var(\bar{X}) = 1/n^2 \sum _{i,j}Cov(X_i, X_j)= 1/n^2 (\sum_i Var(X_i) +\sum_{i \neq j}Cov(X_i,X_j)=\sigma^2/n +(n-1)/n*Cov(X_1,X_2)$.

I dont understand the last step, why $Cov(X_i,X_j) $ is indepedent of $i$ and $j$?

How come $Cov(X_i,X_j) =Cov(X_1, X_2)$? This doesn't make sense.

Reference of detail step: bottom of page 3 from http://dept.stat.lsa.umich.edu/~moulib/sampling.pdf

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Haven't checked the reference. But $X_i$'s must be identically distributed. $\endgroup$ – Dhruv Kohli - expiTTp1z0 Jan 24 '17 at 18:25
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, even that is true, how come $Cov(X_1, X_2)$ they are independent of $i, j$? $\endgroup$ – wrek Jan 24 '17 at 18:40
2
$\begingroup$

Since $X_i$'s are identically distributed $Cov(X_i,X_j), i \neq j$ will be same as $Cov(X_{i'},X_{j'}), i' \neq j'$.

Using $i'=1$ and $j'=2$, $\sum\limits_{i\neq j} Cov(X_i,X_j) = n(n-1)Cov(X_1,X_2)$ and the result follows.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.