3
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\Spec}{\operatorname{Spec}}$I'm looking at the proof of Corollary $8.3.5$ in Vakil's FOAG, which is to show that under certain conditions, the closure of the set-theoretic image of a scheme morphism $\pi:X\to Y$ is the scheme-theoretic image. The first step in this is to see, of course, that the set-theoretic image is indeed contained in the scheme-theoretic image. Vakil asks the reader to check this, so it must not be too complicated, but I'm having trouble proving it.

The scheme-theoretic image is described as follows: for a closed subscheme $i:Z\hookrightarrow Y$, we say the image of $X$ lies in $Z$ if $\mathscr J_{Z/Y}\to\mathscr O_Y\to\pi_*\mathscr O_X$ is exact, where $\mathscr J_{Z/Y}$ is the sheaf of ideals induced by $Z$. We get the scheme-theoretic image by taking the intersection over all such $Z$.

So all we need to show is that if we have such a $Z$, and $p\in X$, then $\pi(p)\in Z$. If we choose an affine open set $\Spec B$ containing $\pi(p)$, then by definition of $X$ lying in $Z$, we have

$$\mathscr J_{Z/Y}(\Spec B)=\ker(B\to\mathscr O_X(\pi^{-1}\Spec B))$$

If we let $I(B)=\mathscr J_{Z/Y}(\Spec B)$, then we note that $Z=\cup \Spec B/I(B)$ as $\Spec B$ runs over all affine open subsets of $Y$, so we just need to show that if $\pi(p)$ corresponds to the prime ideal $\mathfrak q$ of $B$, then $\mathfrak q\supseteq I(B)$.

I feel this should just be an unraveling of definitions, but I'm not seeing it. Can anybody help?

$\endgroup$
2
+50
$\begingroup$

First of all, vakil defines that the image of $X$ lies in $Z$ if the composition $\mathscr{I}_{Z/Y}\to \mathscr{O}_Y\to\pi_*\mathscr{O}_X$ is zero, not that it's exact.

Now, if we take $p\in X$ and let $\text{Spec}B$ be an open affine subset of $Y$ that contains $\pi(p)$. Then we have that the composition $$\mathscr{I}_{Z/Y}(\text{Spec}B)\overset{g}\to \mathscr{O}_Y(\text{Spec}B)\overset{f}\to\pi_*\mathscr{O}_X(\text{Spec}B) \quad (*)$$ is zero. In particular, $\text{Im}g \subseteq \ker f$ and so the prime ideal in $\mathscr{O}_Y(\text{Spec}B)$ that corresponds to $\pi(p)$ contains $\text{Im}g$. However, from the definition of closed embeddings, we have that the following is exact $$0\to\mathscr{I}_{Z/Y}(\text{Spec}B)\overset{g}\to \mathscr{O}_Y(\text{Spec}B)\overset{h}\to i_*\mathscr{O}_Z(\text{Spec}B)\to 0 $$ and so $\text{Im}g = \ker h.$ But now we are done, since the points of $Z\cap\text{Spec} B$ correspond to the prime ideals that contain $\ker h=\text{Im}h$ but by $(*)$, the prime ideal in $\mathscr{O}_Y(\text{Spec}B)$ that corresponds to $\pi(p)$ is such a prime ideal.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much. It makes me wait a few hours before awarding the bounty so I'll accept the answer at the same time I do that $\endgroup$ – Alex Mathers Jan 27 '17 at 11:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.