2
$\begingroup$

I want to compute $\iint_{\Sigma}(\nabla\times F)\cdot \omega dS$ where $\Sigma:=\{(x,y,z)\in\mathbb{R}^3:\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=z, 2+\frac{x}{4}\leq z\leq 4\}$, $F=(y,z,x)$ and $\omega (-3,0,3)=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(1,0,1)$.

1) Applying the divergence theorem I got $\iint_{\Sigma}(\nabla\times F)\cdot \omega dS=\iiint_{V(\Sigma)}\nabla\cdot (\nabla\times F)dV-\iint_{z=4\cap cone}(\nabla\times F)\cdot \omega dS-\iint_{z=2+x/2\cap cone}(\nabla\times F)\cdot \omega dS=0-0-(-16\pi )=16\pi$

2) To check the result I've also applied Stokes's theorem taking as C the circumference $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=4$ and I get $\oint_C F\cdot dr=\int_{0}^{2\pi}(4\sin (t),4,4\cos (t))\cdot (-4\sin (t), 4\cos (t),0)dt- \iint_{z=2+x/2\cap cone} (\nabla\times F)\cdot \omega dS =16\pi -0=16\pi$

So, is what I did correct?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\Sigma$ is not a closed surface. When applying the divergence theorem, you need to subtract the flux through the planes $z=4$ and $z=2+x/4$. $\endgroup$ – Kuifje Jan 21 '17 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ @Kuifje You are right, I applied the divergence theorem again taking into account what you said and I got $-16\pi$ as a result so I guess there's something wrong with the line integral. $\endgroup$ – lorenzo Jan 21 '17 at 19:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your line integral is not necessarily wrong. But you have to compute a second one, the one at at the intersection between the plane $z=2+x/4$ and the cone. $\endgroup$ – Kuifje Jan 21 '17 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Kuifje I subtracted $\iint_{S} (\nabla\times F) \cdot \omega dS=0$ (where $S$ is the intesection between the cone and the plane $z=2+x/4$) from $\oint_{C} F\cdot dr$ (since I understand that was equal to $\iint$ on the region of interest $+ \iint$ on the previously mentioned intersection of cone and plane) and I got $16\pi$, which is equal from what I got using the divergence theorem, so I think what I did is correct. $\endgroup$ – lorenzo Jan 22 '17 at 10:45
1
$\begingroup$

HINT:

The contour $x^2+y^2=4$ does bound the open surface given by $z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ with $2+x/4\le z\le 4$ plus the open (ellipse) surface $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\le 2+x/4=z$. It also bounds the disk $x^2+y^2\le 4$, $z=4$.

But in applying Stokes's Theorem, the line integral either (i) does not include the part of the closed surface $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\le 4$, $z=4$ or (ii) only accounts for the surface $\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \le 4$, $z=4$.

To apply Stokes's Theorem to a closed surface, simply split the surface into two separate surface that share a common boundary contour with opposing orientations.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.