2
$\begingroup$

It seems to me that the equation $x^y = y^x$ has no solution in which $x$ is rational and $y$ irrational, or vice versa. I could not get any counterexample.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would guess that most solutions (or even all solutions apart from $2^4 = 4^2$) where the two numbers are different and one of them is rational would have the other number irrational. But I also think it will be mighty hard to prove. $\endgroup$ – Arthur Jan 16 '17 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ It hardly has any solution with $x\neq y$ in general. $\endgroup$ – barak manos Jan 16 '17 at 14:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @barakmanos you're wrong. $\endgroup$ – Emre Jan 16 '17 at 14:10
  • $\begingroup$ Helpful math.stackexchange.com/questions/9505/… $\endgroup$ – Emre Jan 16 '17 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ This problem is solved, if $x=(1+\frac{1}{t})^t$ and $y=(1+\frac{1}{t})^{t+1}$ are algebraic numbers ($a^b$ with $a\neq 0$, $a\neq 1$, $b$ not rational: Gelfond-Schneider Theorem) but not for all irrational numbers. $\endgroup$ – user90369 Jan 16 '17 at 15:42
6
$\begingroup$

The equation is equivelant to $y\log x = x\log y$ or ${y\over\log y}={x\over\log x}$. As $x/\log x$ is convex, for any rational number $x$, there exists a real number $y$ such that $x^y = y^x$.

Let $y$ be such that $3^y=y^3$. Suppose $y$ is rational, $y=\frac mn$. Then, $$n^{3n}3^m=m^{3n}$$ Which implies $n=1$, as $(m,n)=1$. So, $m^3=3^m$. Contradiction, as $(2,4)$ is the only integer solution.

Thus, $(3,y)$ is a rational-irrational pair for the equation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you prove that for me? I can only get down to the statement "either $y$ is rational or $y$ is transcendental", but I can't get any further. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jan 16 '17 at 14:11
  • $\begingroup$ "As well-known"? Why is it "well-known"??? it is easy to prove that this is the only integer solution. How do you prove that it is the only rational solution? $\endgroup$ – barak manos Jan 16 '17 at 14:11
  • $\begingroup$ Edited for a simpler counterexample. $\endgroup$ – Emre Jan 16 '17 at 14:21
  • $\begingroup$ How does $n^{3n}3^m=m^{3n}\implies n=1$? How do you know $m^3=3^m\implies m\notin\mathbb Q$? $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jan 16 '17 at 14:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $\frac mn$ is the simplest form of $y$, thus $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime. $n^{3n}3^m=m^{3n}$ implies $n|m^3n$, as they're relatively prime, this means $n = 1$. On the other hand, $m$ is already an integer and you can look at this topic math.stackexchange.com/questions/9505/… to see that (2,4) is the only integer solution, so, $(m,3)$ can't be a solution. $\endgroup$ – Emre Jan 16 '17 at 14:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.