1
$\begingroup$

I am posting this question to clarify some doubts I have regarding meaning of certain mathematical statements. So in the question below the polynomial $P$ is a product of two odd degree polynomials. From this we can conclude that it has at lest $2$ real roots. Further it has $14$ complex roots (Fundamental theorem of algebra). My question is why is statement $(D)$ not correct?

Is $(D)$ equivalent to the statement "$P(z)$ has exactly 12 complex roots"

Consider the polynomial $$P(z)=\left(\sum\limits_{n=0}^5 a_nz^n\right)\left(\sum\limits_{n=0}^9 b_n z^n \right)$$ $a_nb_n \in\mathbb{R}, \ a_5,b_9 \neq 0$

Then counting multiplicity we can conclude that $P(z)$ has

$(A)$ at least two real roots

$(B)$ $14$ complex roots

$(C)$ no real roots

$(D)$ 12 complex roots

Answer provided: (A) $\&$ (B)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ your interpretation of D seems to be correct. $\endgroup$ – Anurag A Jan 16 '17 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ If all coefficients of $P(z)$ are real, so we can say at the first sight that, all roots are conjugates. $\endgroup$ – Nosrati Jan 16 '17 at 8:48
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Presumably "$a_5,b_5\ne 0$" should be $a_5,b_9\ne 0$? Otherwise you can't be sure there are more than one real root and 10 roots in total. $\endgroup$ – Henning Makholm Jan 16 '17 at 10:27
0
$\begingroup$

Answer D is claiming that there are exactly 12 roots counted by multiplicity (all roots, including real roots, are complex roots, so that word does not affect the meaning if the answer).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Both statements $(A)$&$(B)$ derive from counting multiplicity as stated in the exercise.

The statements $(C)$&$(D)$ might or might not be true, but there is no way to derive that from counting multiplicity.

So the first two always hold true, while the last two are dependant on the specific polynomials.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Certainly if that polynomial has at least 2 real roots, we can conclude that (C) is false. $\endgroup$ – BigbearZzz Jan 16 '17 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ @BigbearZzz You are correct. Then again, it does not directly stem from counting multiplicity. I find the question rather confusing to be honest, but I should have mentioned on the answer what you said... $\endgroup$ – MathematicianByMistake Jan 16 '17 at 11:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.