Since I solved the other linked problem, I figured I might as well give simulated annealing a go on this one.
The answer is also yes; in fact, here, we can find $3$ disjoint copies of $2K_{3,3} \cup (K_{5,5} - P_{10})$. I added the extra edge in an attempt to make the problem a bit more constrained so that the solution would come out nicer, but I'm not sure how much of an effect it had.
The solution I found is below:

Here is my simulated annealing code (it might take a few tries before finding a zero-energy solution):
edges[{perm1_, perm2_}] :=
Join[
Tuples[{perm1[[1 ;; 3]], perm2[[1 ;; 3]]}],
Tuples[{perm1[[4 ;; 6]], perm2[[4 ;; 6]]}],
Complement[
Tuples[{perm1[[7 ;; 11]], perm2[[7 ;; 11]]}],
Table[{perm1[[i]], perm2[[i]]}, {i, 7, 11}],
Table[{perm1[[i]], perm2[[i + 1]]}, {i, 7, 10}]]];
value[state_] := 102 - Length[Union @@ (edges /@ state)];
randomPerm[] := {RandomSample[Range[11]], RandomSample[Range[11]]}
newState[] := {{Range[11], Range[11]}, randomPerm[], randomPerm[]};
randomSwitch[state_] :=
Module[{h = RandomInteger[{2, 3}], i = RandomInteger[{1, 2}], j, k,
copy = state},
{j, k} = RandomSample[Range[11], 2];
copy[[h, i, {j, k}]] = Reverse[copy[[h, i, {j, k}]]];
Return[copy];
]
currentState = bestState = newState[];
currentEnergy = bestEnergy = value[currentState];
temp = 1;
While[Exp[-1/temp] > 1/1000,
Do[
nextState = randomSwitch[currentState];
nextEnergy = value[nextState];
If[nextEnergy < bestEnergy, bestState = nextState;
bestEnergy = nextEnergy];
prob = Exp[-((nextEnergy - currentEnergy)/temp)];
If[RandomReal[] < prob, currentState = nextState;
currentEnergy = nextEnergy];
, {3000}];
If[bestEnergy == 0, Break[]];
temp *= 0.99; Print[{temp, currentEnergy}]
]
Print["Done ", bestEnergy];