0
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a parallel vector field along the curve $\gamma$. $X(s)=cos(\phi(s))x_1(y^1(s),y^2(s))+\frac{sin(\phi(s))}{h}x_2(y^1(s),y^2(s))$
$x:U\rightarrow M$ is a surface and the metric tensor is given by $g_{ij}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & h^2 \end{pmatrix} \;\;$ ($h\gt0$)
Prove that $\dot\phi(s)=-h_1(y^1(s),y^2(s))\dot y^2(s)$

Note: $\gamma(s)=x(y^1(s),y^2(s))$ is curve in $M$.

Let $ R$ be a polygon bounded by $\gamma$


I did find the solution to the first part but my follow up questions would be, what is the connection between the geodesic curvature of $\gamma$ and $\phi(s)$ ?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Have you calculated the Christoffel symbols and written down the differential equations that the components of a vector field must satisfy if it is parallel along a curve? $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Jan 9 '17 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please clarify what each of these quantities are? Presumably $(y^1, y^2) \in U$ are linear coordinates, $(x_1, x_2)$ are local coordinates in $M$, but what is the relationship between $\gamma, \phi$, and $h$? What is the dependence of $h$ on the location in the manifold? $\endgroup$ – Mnifldz Jan 9 '17 at 22:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Mnifldz: No, $x_i$ is shorthand for $\partial x/\partial y^i$. $h$ is a smooth function on the surface, $\gamma$ and $\phi$ are functions of $s$. I agree that the OP should have made things a bit clearer, but ... Similarly, $h_1 = \partial h/\partial y^1$. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Jan 9 '17 at 22:55
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin: I did find the solution but I got a follow up question (What is the connnection of the geodesic curver of $\gamma$ and $\phi(s)$) $\endgroup$ – XPenguen Jan 10 '17 at 18:08
1
$\begingroup$

You've arrived at a vector field $X$ that is parallel along $\gamma$. You need to look at the angle $\psi$ between $X$ and $\dot\gamma$ and see at what rate it is changing. That is, $\dot\psi$ will be the geodesic curvature of $\gamma$, assuming that $\gamma$ is arclength-parametrized.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain why the geodesic curvature is the rate of change of the angle between $\dot \gamma$ and $X$ ? $\endgroup$ – XPenguen Jan 10 '17 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ What is your definition of geodesic curvature? Why not start with that and do the computation? $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Jan 10 '17 at 19:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.