4
$\begingroup$

$$ \tan (2m \theta) + \cos(2n \theta) =0 $$

I am trying to solve this trigonometric equation of theta to get a general solution.

I tried this question by using the substitutions $t_1= \tan(n\theta)$ and $t_2= \tan(m \theta)$.

But i was not able to get a good answer.

Any ideas ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If $\frac nm$ is a whole number, we may employ chebyshev polynomials to see this reduces down to factoring a polynomial. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jan 8 '17 at 1:29
  • $\begingroup$ And clearly if we get polynomials degree $5$ or higher, I cannot expect easily accessible solutions. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jan 8 '17 at 1:30
2
$\begingroup$

As marty cohen answered, for the most general case, only numerical methods will be able to solve the equation $$\tan (2m \theta) + \cos(2n \theta) =0$$ which, as he wrote, would be better written as $$\tan(t)+\cos(rt)=0$$ The problem is that the function $$f(t)=\tan(t)+\cos(rt)$$ presents an infinite number of discontinuities at $t=(2k+1)\frac \pi 2$ and thius is never very good.

Assuming $\cos(t)\neq 0$ as a possible solution, I suggest that you look instead for the zero's of $$g(t)=\sin(t)+\cos(t)\cos(rt)$$ which is continuous everywhere.

Starting froma "reasonable" guess $t_0$, Newton method will updtate it according to $$t_{n+1}=t_n+\frac{\cos (t_n) \cos (r t_n)+\sin (t_n)}{\sin (t_n) \cos (r t_n)+\cos (t_n) (r \sin (r t_n)-1)}$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have a feeling that the same person downvoted both of us. $\endgroup$ – marty cohen Jan 8 '17 at 6:11
  • $\begingroup$ @martycohen. I do think so ! Cheers. $\endgroup$ – Claude Leibovici Jan 8 '17 at 6:12
1
$\begingroup$

I think that it is unlikely that there is a general solution.

By letting $t = 2m\theta$ and $r = n/m$, $\tan (2m \theta) + \cos(2n \theta) =0 $ becomes $\tan (t) = \cos(rt) $.

Looking at the graphs of $\tan(t)$ and $\cos(rt)$, we see that there is at least one solution in each range $k\pi \le t < (k+1)\pi$. Therefore there are a countable infinity of solutions independent of the values of $n$ and $m$.

Also, if $r < 1$ (or $n < m$), there is exactly one root in each interval.

So it seems to me that only numerical calculations can find the roots in general.

However, for small values of $n$ or $m$, there may be explicit solutions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.