1
$\begingroup$

Prove that a differentiable function $f\colon I\to\mathbb{C}$ on an interval $I$ with bounded derivative is Lipschitz continuous, i.e. If $\lvert f'\rvert\leq L $ for some $L\in\mathbb{R}$, then for any $x_1,x_2\in I$ we have $$ \lvert f(x_1)-f(x_2)\rvert\leqslant L\lvert x_1-x_2\rvert. $$

Despite two little things, I think the proof should work as follows:

I think, we can choose some $c\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\lvert c\rvert =1$ such that $$ \lvert f(x_2)-f(x_1)\rvert = c\cdot (f(x_2)-f(x_1))~~(*) $$ since for $$ \frac{f(x_2)-f(x_1)}{\lvert f(x_2)-f(x_1)\rvert}=:v $$ we have $\lvert v\rvert =1$ and then we can define $c:=v^{-1}$.

Next, in order to have equation $(*)$, the LHS has to be the real part of the RHS, i.e. $$ \lvert f(x_2)-f(x_1)\rvert =\Re(c\cdot (f(x_2)-f(x_1)))=\varphi(x_2)-\varphi(x_1), $$ where $$ \varphi:=\Re(cf). $$

Now, since $f$ is differentiable on $I$, it is, in particular, continuous on $[x_1,x_2]$, hence $\varphi$ is also continuous on $[x_1,x_2]$.

I am not sure about the following question:

Do we also have that $\varphi$ is differentiable on $(x_1,x_2)$? (Q)

Assuming that we can answer question (Q) with YES, we could apply the mean value Theorem on $\varphi$, telling us that $$ \varphi(x_2)-\varphi(x_1)=(x_2-x_1)\varphi'(\xi) $$ for some $\xi\in (x_1,x_2)$.

By assumption, $\varphi'(\xi)=\Re(cf'(\xi))\leq\lvert cf'(\xi)\rvert\leq L$ and hence $$ \lvert f(x_2)-f(x_1)\rvert = \varphi(x_2)-\varphi(x_1)=(x_2-x_1)\varphi'(\xi)\leqslant L\lvert x_2-x_1\rvert. $$

I am also not completely sure if $$ \varphi' = \Re(cf') $$ is correct.

Despite the two things in the two yellow boxes, I am pretty sure the proof should work. It would be nice if you could give me some hints.

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You need to complex conjugate $c$. $\varphi$ is in general not differentiable if $0\in f((x_1, x_2))$. You could consider the squared absolute value. $\endgroup$ – user251257 Jan 6 '17 at 21:32
  • $\begingroup$ You mean $\lvert f(x_2)-f(x_1)\rvert = \bar{v} (f(x_2)-f(x_1))$? $\endgroup$ – Rhjg Jan 6 '17 at 21:36
  • $\begingroup$ yes, or to circumvent the differentiability issue just set $c = \overline{f(x_2) - f(x_1)}$. $\endgroup$ – user251257 Jan 6 '17 at 21:38
  • $\begingroup$ Here is a related answer that does something similar math.stackexchange.com/a/2078872/27978. Essentially the idea is that if $\operatorname{re} (cz) \le K |c|$ for all $c$, then $|z| \le K$. In the above case, $K=L|x_1-x_2|$, $|c|=1$ and $z=f(x_1)-f(x_2)$. The answer to both of your yellow boxes is yes. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jan 6 '17 at 21:48
  • $\begingroup$ @user251257 Sorry, but did not get why $\varphi$ isn't differentiable if $0\in f((x_1,x_2))$. Could you explain that, please? $\endgroup$ – Rhjg Jan 6 '17 at 22:20
1
$\begingroup$

Since $\operatorname{re}$ is continuous we have $\lim_{h \to 0} \operatorname{re} {cf(z+h)-cf(x) \over h} = \lim_{h \to 0} {\operatorname{re}(cf(z+h))-\operatorname{re}(cf(x)) \over h} = \operatorname{re} (cf'(x))$. That is, if $\phi(x) = \operatorname{re}(cf(x))$, then $\phi'(x) = \operatorname{re} (cf'(x))$.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why can we write the Re in front of the whole fraction, i.e. do not see the first equation. $\endgroup$ – Rhjg Jan 6 '17 at 22:58
  • $\begingroup$ If $b$ is real, then $\operatorname{re} ({a \over b}) = {\operatorname{re} a \over b}$. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jan 6 '17 at 23:31
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, of course!! h is real here... i thought it is complex but we are dealing with an interval. $\endgroup$ – Rhjg Jan 6 '17 at 23:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.