4
$\begingroup$

For each $n \geq 1$, we denote by $\mathbb{Q}_n$ the unique subfield of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{p^{n+1}})$ for which $[\mathbb{Q}_n:\mathbb{Q}]=p^n$. Let now $K$ be a finite Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ with the following properties:

  1. K contains $\mathbb{Q}_m$ for some $m \geq 1$;
  2. There exists an element $g \in Gal(K/\mathbb{Q})$ with the property that the order of $g$ is $p^n$ with $n>m$ and $\left. g \right|_{\mathbb{Q}_m}$ is the generator of the Galois group $Gal(\mathbb{Q}_m/\mathbb{Q})$.

Is it then true that $K$ must contain $\mathbb{Q}_t$ for some $t>m$?

I have tried to use quite a lot of theory around wild ramification and local considerations (including this post wildly ramified extensions and $p$-power roots of unity ), without success in producing a proof/counterexample.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you impose extra conditions on K/Q, especially about ramification ? Your title mentions wild ramification. $\endgroup$ – nguyen quang do Jan 7 '17 at 8:21
  • $\begingroup$ No, the conditions are just those mentioned. The "wild ramification" bit is there due to the local behaviour (in my notations $\mathbb{Q}_m,p/\mathbb{Q}_p$ is wildly ramified and the hope is that at every prime above p, the condition on $g$ will give a larger wildly ramified extension at every such prime). Also, if it turns out that there is a counterexample, I would be very grateful to know some further conditions which would make it work. $\endgroup$ – Jake Haider Jan 7 '17 at 11:29
2
$\begingroup$

Since the prime $p$ ($\neq 2$ for simplification) plays a special role, let us concentrate on the case when $K/Q$ is a $p$-extension, i.e. a Galois extension whose group $G$ is a finite $p$-group. The case of a general $G$ can be derived from this provided we have sufficient information on the structure of $G$. Suppose also that $K/Q$ is $S$-ramified, i.e. unramified outside a finite set of primes $S$={$p$} $\cup$ $T$, with $T$ = {$l_1,...,l_r$} or $T$ empty. Note that the presence of $p$ is necessary because we'll deal with the so-called cyclotomic $Z_p$-extension of $Q$, namely $G_S (k) = \cup Q_n$.

For a number field $k$ and the set $S_k$ of places of $k$ above $S$ (we'll write $S$ for $S_k$, no confusion is possible), denote by $k_S$ the maximal pro-$p$-extension of $k$ which is $S$-ramified, and $G_S (k) = Gal(k_S/k)$. The description of $G_S (k)$ by generators and relations can be approached using CFT and Galois cohomology, as for example in H. Koch's book "Galois Theory of p-extensions". In particular, the minimal number $d$ of generators (resp. the number $r$ of relations) of $G_S (k)$ is equal to the $Z/pZ$-dimension of $H^1(G_S (k), Z/pZ)$ (resp. of $H^2(.)$). Actually, $d$ has been computed by Shafarevitch (op. cit.,§11, thm. 11.8), and $r$ is given by a so-called Euler-Poincaré characteristic formula : $1-d+r = -c$, where $c$ is the number of complex places of $k$.

After these preliminaries, we can attack your problem over $k = Q$. Since no ramification condition is specified, we must consider two separate cases:

1) If $T$ is empty, i.e. only wild ramification is allowed, Shafarevitch's formula over $Q$ gives $d=1$ and $r=0$, in other words, $G_S (Q)$ is the free pro-$p$-group on a single generator, which is $Z_p$. Equivalently, $Q_S = Q_{\infty}$ , which implies that $K$ = a certain $Q_n$ , and the answer to your question is trivially YES

2) If $T$ is not empty, i.e. tame ramification is allowed, let $ Q_m = K \cap Q_{\infty}$ , $G = Gal(K/Q)$ and $H = Gal(K/Q_m)$. Suppose, as you do, that there exists $g \in G$, of order $n>m$, such that its image $ g$ mod $H$ in $G/H$ generates $G/H = Gal(Q_m/Q)$. Replace $K$ by the fixed field $L$ of $(H \cap<g>)$, so that the image $g$ mod $(H\cap<g>)$ in $Gal(L/Q)$ generates a subgroup isomorphic to $Gal(Q_m/Q)$. This means that that the exact sequence $1 \to Gal(L/Q_m) \to Gal(L/Q) \to Gal(Q_m/Q) \to 1$ splits, i.e. describes a semi-direct product. So in this case the answer to your question will be NO if we can construct the adequate extension $L/Q_m$ . If $T$ = {$l_1,...,l_r$}, the number of relations of $G_S (Q)$ will be $r$, more precisely the relations will come from $r$ local tame relations of the type (op. cit., §10, thm. 10.2) $t^{l-1}[t^{-1}, s^{-1}]=1$ (necessarily, $l\equiv 1$ mod $p$ to allow ramification). This means that the maximal abelian quotient of $G_S (Q)$, considered as a $Z_p$-module, will have rank 1 and torsion isomorphic to a product of cyclic groups $Z/(l -1)Z$. By adjusting our $l$, we can immediately construct the desired extension $L/Q_m$ ./.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is a very nice and beautifully presented answer, thank you very much for it! Before I can fully unfold the counter-example in the second part of your answer, I would like to understand 2 basic things: I might be missing something obvious, but why is $L$ in your notation necessarily Galois over $\mathbb{Q}$? Also, once the adequate $L$ is constructed, how does one recover the element $g$ in the larger extension $K/\mathbb{Q}$? $\endgroup$ – Jake Haider Jan 10 '17 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ I supposed implicitly that <g> is normal (hence <g^n/m> obviously is) but on re-reading your post, I see that you do not assume that. It does not matter anyway, since we are only looking for a counter-example, and we may as well take K/Q abelian.Then the same reasoning as before shows that the abelian Gal(L/Q) is a direct product, but perhaps it would be clearer to construct directly an abelian K/Q (K, not L) with the required required g. $\endgroup$ – nguyen quang do Jan 11 '17 at 7:14
1
$\begingroup$

On re-reading my second comment, I do not find it very enlightening, so I propose to replace it by this more detailed answer (mainly in order to be able to type math symbols (*)). I also edited two unfortunate misprints in my first answer (just before the exact sequence of Galois groups).

So let us construct our abelian extension $K/Q$ with the required $g$ of order $p^n$, with $n>m$, and such that $Gal(K/Q)\cong Gal(K/Q_m) \times Gal(Q_m/Q)$. We have seen that he Galois group of the maximal abelian $S$-ramified $S$-extension of $Q$ is a direct product ($Z_p, +$)$\times \mathcal T$, where the torsion group $\mathcal T$ is a finite product of cyclic groups of the form $Z/(l-1)Z$. Because a subgroup of $Z_p$ is isomorphic to $Z_p$ hence is pro-$p$-free, $Gal(K/Q)$ will be viewed as a quotient of $Gal(Q_m/Q) \times\mathcal T$ and $Gal(K/Q_m)$ as a quotient of $\mathcal T$. Then choose $l \in T$, such that $p^n$ divides exactly $ 1- p^n$, so that $Gal(K/Q)$ will contain an element $g$ of order $p^n$ coming from $\mathcal T$. Taking further $l' \in T, l' \neq l $, $T=${$l, l'$}, and $Gal(K/Q_m) \cong$ the factor $Z/(l'-1)Z$ of $\mathcal T$, we get our extension $K$ with the desired properties. Things could be seen much more clearly by drawing Galois diagrams.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for this update, it did clarify the questions I had in the previous comments. The second part of the previous answer also contains much more information and analyzing it lead me to the following question: Can one exhibit a necessary and sufficient condition (or at least sufficient and non-trivial) for $K$ so that if $K \cap \mathbb{Q}_{\infty}=\mathbb{Q}_m$, then we have $Gal(K/\mathbb{Q})$ is the semidirect product between $Gal(K/\mathbb{Q}_m)$ and $Gal(\mathbb{Q}_m/\mathbb{Q})$? $\endgroup$ – Jake Haider Jan 11 '17 at 10:44
  • $\begingroup$ I think I have a proof using local considerations that this is always the case (as in, for any $K$ one has a semi-direct product), I would be happy to know if you think it shoudln't be this way. $\endgroup$ – Jake Haider Jan 11 '17 at 15:44
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps we should discuss this in the "chat" space ? $\endgroup$ – nguyen quang do Jan 12 '17 at 9:45
  • $\begingroup$ sure, any particular room? $\endgroup$ – Jake Haider Jan 12 '17 at 10:07
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by a "room" ? I know nothing of the procedure. I suggest that you choose your own "room" and then "invite" me. $\endgroup$ – nguyen quang do Jan 12 '17 at 15:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.