I've learned in my course of linear algebra that we can find the best approximation of a continuous real function $f$ defined in $[a-r,a+r]$ ($a,r$ real numbers with $r>0$), by a polynomial $p_r$ of degree $n$ by taking the orthogonal projection of that function over the subspace of polynomials of degree $n$. But there is a polynomial $T$ of degree $n$ that gives us a better approximation of $f$ for points that are close enough to $a$, namely its taylor polynomial. In other words, if we restrict $f$ to some small (by "small" I mean "small enough so that this statement becames true") neighborhood of $a$ of radius $\epsilon$ its Taylor polynomial $T$ restricted to that neighborhood is a better approximation than the restriction of $p_r$ to that same neighborhood.
If now we compare $p_{\epsilon}$ instead of $p_r$, that is the orthogonal projection of $f$ restricted to the neighborhood of $a$ of radius $\epsilon$ over the subspace of polynomials of degree $n$ in that neighborhood, $p_{\epsilon}$ should be a better "global approximation" for that restriction of $f$ than the restriction of $T$. But again we can choose a smaller neighborhood of $a$ so that the resctriction of $T$ beats the restriction of $p_{\epsilon}$.

So, does it make sense to think of the Taylor polynomial of degree $n$ of $f$ around the point $a$ as the limit of $p_{\epsilon}$ as $\epsilon \to 0$?

  • $\begingroup$ There is a way to think of it in terms of direct limits (which is a more advanced, algebraic object). $\endgroup$ – Michael Burr Jan 4 '17 at 13:31

I'm being intentionally vague here to give some ideas without the lengthy background of abstract algebra.

Let $O_a$ be the set of analytic functions defined at $a$ where two functions are identified if they agree in a neighborhood of $a$. This is sometimes called the "germ" of functions at $a$.

Inside of $O_a$ let $m_a$ be the set of functions that vanish at $a$. In this case, $m_a$ is generated by $(x-a)$.

In this case (using abstract algebra), we can consider the ring $O_a/m_a$. The image of a function $f$ in this ring is the value of this function at $a$.

Consider the image of the function $f$ in $O_a/(m_a^2)$. This is, essentially, the first order Taylor expansion of $f$.

We can take more powers of zeros at $a$, i.e., $m_a^k$ and look at the image (think of this as your projection), this corresponds to the Taylor expansion of degree $k$. By taking what is called the inverse limit of these values, we can recover the Taylor expansion of $f$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the explanation! I definitely need to read it again more carefully and look for some background material. $\endgroup$ – la flaca Jan 4 '17 at 13:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.