5
$\begingroup$

I have the following two norms for mesurable complex valued functions $f \colon X\to \mathbb{C}$:

$$\|f \|_1 := \inf \big\{ c \geq 0 \colon \mu (\{ x \in X \colon |f(x)| > c \}) = 0 \big\}$$ and $$\|f\|_2 := \sup \big\{ |\lambda| \colon \lambda \in r_{\mathrm{ess}}(f)\big\},$$ where $$ r_{\mathrm{ess}}(f) := \big\{\lambda \in \mathbb{C} \colon \forall \varepsilon > 0: \mu(f^{-1}(B_\varepsilon(\lambda)) > 0 \big\},$$ where $B_\varepsilon(\lambda)$ denotes the open ball with radius $\varepsilon$ centered at $\lambda$.

It is easy to show, that $\|f\|_2 \leq \|f\|_1$ but I have not been able to prove the converse. Any suggestions?

I think the problem boils down to showing that $\mu\big(\;f^{-1}(\mathbb{C} \setminus r_{\mathrm{ess}}(f))\big) = 0$.


EDIT

One possible proof could be like this:

We exhaust the set $S := \mathbb{C} \setminus \overline{ B_{\|f\|_2}(0)}$ in two steps: First for all $m \in \mathbb{N}$ by annuli $$ S_{m,n} := S_{\|f\|_2 + \frac{1}{m}, \|f\|_2 + n} := \bigg\{ \lambda \in \mathbb{C} \colon \|f\|_2 + \frac{1}{m} \leq |\lambda | \leq \|f\|_2 + n\bigg\} $$ with $\mu(f^{-1}(S_{m,n})) = 0$, i.e. for $$ S_m := \bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} S_{m,n} $$ we get $\mu(f^{-1}(S_{m})) = 0$.

Secondly, by considering $$ S = \bigcup_{m \in \mathbb{N}} S_{m} $$ we show the claim.

Proof. Let $m,n$ be given. Then, for all $\lambda \in S_{m,n}$ there exists $\varepsilon_\lambda > 0$ such that $$\mu\bigg(\big\{f^{-1}\big(B_{\varepsilon_\lambda}(\lambda)\big)\big\}\bigg) = 0.$$

But $S_{m,n}$ is compact, i.e. we get $\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_k$ such that $$ S_{m,n} \subseteq \bigcup_{i = 1,\dots,k} B_{\varepsilon_{\lambda_i}} (\lambda_i). $$ Hence (assuming completeness of $\mu$) we have that $f^{-1}(S_{m,n})$ is a set of measure zero, as well as the countable union of all $S_{m,n}$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$. So, for all $m \in \mathbb{N}$ the sets $f^{-1}(S_m)$ are of measure zero and the fact that $S = \bigcup_{m \in \mathbb{N}}$ gives the claim: We have $$\mu (\{ x \in X \colon |f(x)| > \|f\|_2 \}) = 0$$ i.e. $\|f\|_2 \geq \|f\|_1$. $\square$

What do you think?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ $U_\epsilon(\lambda)$ is an open ball of radius $\epsilon$ centered at $\lambda$? $\endgroup$ – Glitch Jan 1 '17 at 12:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Glitch: Yes it is. $\endgroup$ – el_tenedor Jan 1 '17 at 12:02
3
$\begingroup$

I think the problem boils down to showing that $\mu\big(\;f^{-1}(\mathbb{C} \setminus r_{\mathrm{ess}}(f))\big) = 0$.

Strictly speaking, that is a bit more than needed. With $s = \lVert f\rVert_2$, showing

$$\mu\Bigl(f^{-1}\bigl(\mathbb{C}\setminus \overline{B_s(0)}\bigr)\Bigr) = 0\tag{1}$$

is what is precisely needed to show $\lVert f\rVert_1 \leqslant \lVert f\rVert_2$. And that is exactly what you correctly proved in your edit.

Let me add a proof of

$$\mu\bigl(f^{-1}(\mathbb{C} \setminus r_{\mathrm{ess}}(f))\bigr) = 0$$

though. By definition of the essential range, if $\lambda \notin r_{\text{ess}}(f)$, then there is an $\varepsilon_{\lambda} > 0$ such that $\mu\bigl(f^{-1}(B_{\varepsilon_{\lambda}}(\lambda)\bigr) = 0$. For $\lambda' \in U := B_{\varepsilon_{\lambda}}(\lambda)$, the ball $B_{\delta}(\lambda')$, where $\delta = \varepsilon_{\lambda} - \lvert \lambda' - \lambda\rvert > 0$, is contained in $U$, hence $\mu\bigl(f^{-1}(B_{\delta}(\lambda')\bigr) \leqslant \mu\bigl(f^{-1}(U)\bigr) = 0$, and so $\lambda' \notin r_{\text{ess}}(f)$. Thus $U \cap r_{\text{ess}}(f) = \varnothing$, and we have shown

The essential range of a measurable function is closed.

Choosing an $\varepsilon_{\lambda} > 0$ as above for every $\lambda \notin r_{\text{ess}}(f)$, we get an open cover

$$\mathscr{U} = \bigl\{ B_{\varepsilon_{\lambda}}(\lambda) : \lambda \in \mathbb{C}\setminus r_{\text{ess}}(f)\bigr\}$$

of $\mathbb{C}\setminus r_{\text{ess}}(f)$. Since $\mathbb{C}$ is second countable, this open cover has a countable subcover, so there is a sequence $(\lambda_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ such that

$$\mathbb{C}\setminus r_{\text{ess}}(f) = \bigcup_{n = 0}^{\infty} B_{\varepsilon_{\lambda_n}}(\lambda_n).$$

Then

$$f^{-1}\bigl(\mathbb{C}\setminus r_{\text{ess}}(f)\bigr) = \bigcup_{n = 0}^{\infty} f^{-1}\bigl( B_{\varepsilon_{\lambda_n}}(\lambda_n)\bigr)$$

is a countable union of $\mu$-null sets.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for reading my thoughts, haha; After finishing my proof I still kept wondering about $\mu\bigl(f^{-1}(\mathbb{C} \setminus r_{\mathrm{ess}}(f))\bigr) = 0$... $\endgroup$ – el_tenedor Jan 1 '17 at 17:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.