I'm a student of physics. There is an identity in tensor calculus involving Kronecker deltas ans Levi-Civita pseudo tensors is given by $$\epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{klm}=\delta_{il}\delta_{jm}-\delta_{im}\delta_{jl}$$ which is extensively used in physics in deriving various identities. I have neither found a proof of this in physics textbooks nor in Wikipedia. In particular, how does the above formula follow from the definition of $\epsilon_{ijk}$ tensor$$\epsilon_{ijk} = \begin{cases} +1 & \text{ for even permutations }, \\ -1 & \text{ for odd permutations } ,\\ \;\;\,0 & \text{ for repetition of indices }, \end{cases}$$ This is the only definition of I'm familiar with.


Here's an explicit proof that doesn't rely on knowning anything about determinants and just uses the definition of $\epsilon_{ijk}$ and $\delta_{ij}$.

Consider first

$$ \epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{lmn} $$

This quantity is $+1$ if $(lmn)$ is an even permutation of $(ijk)$ and $-1$ if $(lmn)$ is an odd permutation of $(ijk)$. It is $0$ if $(lmn)$ is not a permutation of $(ijk)$. This means each of $(ijk)$ must have a pair in $(lmn)$. We can enumerate all possibilities.

\begin{align} \epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{lmn} = &\delta_{il}\delta_{jm}\delta_{kn} + \delta_{im}\delta_{jn}\delta_{kl} + \delta_{in}\delta_{jl}\delta_{km}\\ -&\delta_{in}\delta_{jm}\delta_{kl} - \delta_{il}\delta_{jn}\delta_{km} - \delta_{im}\delta_{jl}\delta_{kn} \end{align}

Let us now set $l=i$ and sum over $i$ (with Einstein summation notation implied)

\begin{align} \epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{imn} = &\delta_{ii}\delta_{jm}\delta_{kn} + \delta_{im}\delta_{jn}\delta_{ki} + \delta_{in}\delta_{ji}\delta_{km}\\ -&\delta_{in}\delta_{jm}\delta_{ki} - \delta_{ii}\delta_{jn}\delta_{km} - \delta_{im}\delta_{ji}\delta_{kn}\\ =& 3\delta_{jm}\delta_{kn} + \delta_{km}\delta_{jn} + \delta_{jn}\delta_{km}\\ -&\delta_{kn}\delta_{jm} - 3\delta_{jn}\delta_{km} - \delta_{jm}\delta_{kn}\\ =& \delta_{jm}\delta_{kn} - \delta_{jn}\delta_{km} \end{align}

By a change of index $i\rightarrow k \rightarrow j\rightarrow i$ and $m\rightarrow l$, $n\rightarrow m$ we get

\begin{align} \epsilon_{kij}\epsilon_{klm}=\epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{klm} = \delta_{il}\delta_{jm} - \delta_{im}\delta_{jl} \end{align}


We have that (the repeated index $s$ is summed and therefore it cannot enter into the result)

$\begin{align} \epsilon_{sab}\epsilon_{sij}= A_{abij} \end{align}$

where $A_{abij}=-A_{baij}=-A_{abji}=A_{ijab}$, which are obvious symmetries of the still unknown symbol $A$. Since $\epsilon_{sab}$ is non-zero only if $s\neq a\neq b\neq s$ (i.e. the indexes are all different), and similarly for $\epsilon_{sij}$, the only possibility to have a non-zero result is that $a=i$ and $b=j$ or that $a=j$ and $b=i$, so that

$\begin{align} A_{abij} = \alpha \delta_{ai} \delta_{bj} + \beta \delta_{aj} \delta_{bi} \end{align}$

To implement the expected symmetries of $A$ we must have $\alpha = -\beta$. The value $\alpha = 1$ is fixed by considering any non-zero particular case (e.g. $a=i=1$, $b=j=2$, gives $\epsilon_{s12}\epsilon_{s12}= \epsilon_{312}\epsilon_{312}=1$).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.