2
$\begingroup$

Let $H$ is a real, $n$-dimensional vector space.

Define $\varphi \colon \operatorname{GL}(H) \rightarrow \operatorname{GL}(\wedge^{k}H)$ by $A \mapsto \wedge^{k}A$ and $\psi_{\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle} \colon \operatorname{GL}(\wedge^{k}H) \rightarrow T$ given by $J \mapsto\langle J(\cdot),J(\cdot)⟩$.

Here, $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ is some inner product on $H$, $$ T = \{g \colon \wedge^{k}H\times \wedge^{k}H \, | \, g \text{ is a inner product on } \wedge^{k}H\}$$ and

$$\langle u_{1}\wedge...\wedge u_{k},v_{1}\wedge...\wedge v_{k} \rangle \colon= \det(\langle u_{i},v_{j}\rangle)_{k\times k}. $$

Define $S:=\{h:H\times H|$ $h$ is a inner product in $H\}$ and set $R_{h}:=\psi_{h} \circ \varphi(Gl(H))$.

Does it hold that $T = \bigcup_{h \in S} R_{h}$?

Related: Exterior Power: Find a orthornormal basis in Hilbert Space.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, the same technique used in the answer of the linked question can show it. Construct a map from an $\frac{n(n+1)}{2} + n^2$ dimensional manifold to $T$ whose image is your union and show that it cannot be onto by dimensional considerations. $\endgroup$ – levap Dec 26 '16 at 21:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yeah. Your function (which is not linear, BTW) is not injective but this makes the problem even worse. A metric on $\Lambda^k(H)$ depends on $\Theta(n^{2k})$ (at least as long as $k \leq \frac{n}{2}$) parameters while you hope to describe it only using $\Theta(n^2)$ parameters so this cannot work in general. I encourage you to write a complete and rigourous answer to your question and accept it. $\endgroup$ – levap Dec 26 '16 at 21:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, maybe my asymptotic is wrong in general but it is definitely true if $k = 2$ (then the dimension of $\Lambda^k(H)$ is $\frac{n(n-1)}{2}$ and the dimension of the space of metrics on $\Lambda^k(H)$ is $\frac{\frac{n(n-1)}{2} \left( \frac{n(n-1)}{2} + 1\right)}{2} = \Theta(n^4)$) which is bad enough. $\endgroup$ – levap Dec 26 '16 at 21:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I didn't say that it always works, I just said that it cannot work for general $n,k$. I'm also quite sure it won't work even when $n = 4$ and $k = 2$ but you'll have to take into consideration the redundancy of your description. The map $\gamma$ is very not one-to-one and if you'll eliminate it and describe it more concisely using less parameters, you'll get a better estimate. If you want, I can try and show why it doesn't work even when $k = 2$ and $n = 4$. $\endgroup$ – levap Dec 26 '16 at 22:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've added an answer that handles also the $k = 2$ and $n = 4$ case. BTW, where do you get all those questions? They are very interesting but I wonder what is the motivation for them. $\endgroup$ – levap Dec 26 '16 at 23:44
2
$\begingroup$

You have suggested the following procedure to construct an inner product on $\Lambda^k(H)$:

  1. Choose some inner product $h \colon H \times H \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ on $H$.
  2. Choose some linear isomorphism $A \colon H \rightarrow H$.
  3. Define an inner product $\gamma(h,A)$ on $\Lambda^k(H)$ by the formula $$ \gamma(h,A)(v_1 \wedge \dots \wedge v_k, w_1 \wedge \dots \wedge w_k) := \det( h(Av_i, Aw_j))_{i,j=1}^k. $$

In your notation, $h = \left< \cdot, \cdot \right>$ and

$$ \gamma(h,A)(v_1 \wedge \dots \wedge v_k, w_1 \wedge \dots \wedge w_k) = \left< \Lambda^k(A)(v_1 \wedge \dots \wedge v_k), \Lambda^k(A)(w_1 \wedge \dots \wedge w_k) \right> = \left< Av_1 \wedge \dots \wedge Av_k, Aw_1 \wedge \dots \wedge Aw_k \right> = \det( \left< Av_i, Aw_j \right>)_{i,j=1}^k. $$

Now, this procedure is extremely redundant in the following sense. You could have started with an arbitrary fixed inner product $g$ on $H$ and take a positive definite map $T \colon H \rightarrow H$ (with respect to $g$) and construct $\gamma(g,T)$. In fact, these already constructs all the metrics of the form $\gamma(h,A)$ for all $h,A$. Let me state this precisely and prove it. Fix some inner product $g$ on $H$.

Claim: Given $h,A$ there exists a $g$-positive definite map $T \colon H \rightarrow H$ such that $\gamma(h,A) = \gamma(g,T)$. Proof: Let $A = UP$ be the polar decomposition of $A$ with respect to $h$. Let $S$ be the map determined uniquely by $g(Sv,w) = h(Pv,Pw)$. Then $S$ is $g$-symmetric and positive. Finally, let $T = \sqrt{S}$ be the $g$-square root of $S$. We have

$$ h(Av, Aw) = h(UPv, UPw) = h(Pv,Pw) = g(Sv,w) = g(T^2v,w) = g(Tv,Tw) $$

but then

$$ \gamma(h,A)(v_1 \wedge \dots \wedge v_k, w_1 \wedge \dots \wedge w_k) = \det( h(Av_i, Aw_j))_{i,j=1}^k = \det (g(Tv_i, Tw_j))_{i,j=1}^k = \gamma(g,T)(v_1 \wedge \dots \wedge v_k, w_1 \wedge \dots \wedge w_k). $$


Thus, the image $\gamma(S,\operatorname{GL}(H))$ is in fact the same as $\gamma(g,\mathcal{P})$ where $\mathcal{P}$ denotes the set of $g$-positive definite operators on $H$. Thus, we have a map $\psi \colon \mathcal{P} \rightarrow \mathcal{T}$ given by $\psi(T) = \gamma(g,T)$ which has the same image as $\gamma$. Now, $\dim \mathcal{P} = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ while $\dim \mathcal{T} = \frac{{n \choose k} \left( {n \choose k} + 1 \right)}{2}$ so in general, the map $\psi$ cannot be surjective.

For example, when $n = 4$ and $k = 2$, we have $\dim \mathcal{P} = 6$ while $\dim \mathcal{T} = 21$.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Alternatively, the image is the same as $\gamma(S,\operatorname{Id})$ which is even easier to show. $\endgroup$ – levap Dec 26 '16 at 23:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.