$\{(1,2),(2,3),(1,3),(3,1)\}$ is our set.

According to this set, I know that it isn't reflexive. Because;

$\{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)\}$ are missing.

However, I also think that it's symmetric and transitive. Transitive because;


Symmetric because;


Is it correct or to be symmetric, should each one of the subsets be symmetric? Like;



  • $\begingroup$ By definition, in order to say that a relation $R$ is symmetric, you should for all $x$ and $y$ have if $xRy$ then $yRx$. You have $(1,2)$ in the set, thus $(2,1)$ should also be contained which is not the case. Thus the relation is not symmetric. It is also not transitive since $(2,3)$ and $(3,1)$ are in the set but $(2,1)$ isn't. $\endgroup$ – Levent Dec 18 '16 at 14:07

It is not symmetric because for example $(1,2)$ is in the set but $(2,1)$ is not.

It is not transitive also because $(1,3)$ and $(3,1)$ are in the set, but $(1,1)$ is not.

The $\{(1,2),(2,1),(2,3),(3,2),(1,3),(3,1)\}$ will be indeed symmetric, but still not transitive. You still need to add $(1,1)$, $(2,2)$ and $(3,3)$ to make it transitive, and in this case it will also become reflexive on $\{1,2,3\}$, however it will not be reflexive on $\{1,2,3,4\}$ (for that you would need to include $(4,4)$ as well).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.