2
$\begingroup$

So, I've read that $|0\rangle$ does not mean the zero vector, that is just represented by $0$. So what does $|0\rangle$ and $\langle 0|$ "equal" in standard matrix notation? In particular, are there some general rules I can follow for the translation of bra-ket notation into standard matrix notation? I come up against problems like $\langle 0|0\rangle$ and I understand what is happening intuitively, but I have no idea how to practically carry it out (for what it's worth, I'm used to normal matrix notation and can solve problems in it).

Thanks!

EDIT:

Perhaps I didn't make my question clear. I know that $\langle 0|0\rangle$ represents an inner product or dot product, that $\langle 0|$ represents a row vector, and that $|0\rangle$ represents a column vector; this is what I meant by understanding it intuitively. However, given the problem $\langle 0|0\rangle$ I don't know what the answer is, because I don't know how to work it out; I'm used to standard matrix notation.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ the $0$ in $|0\rangle$ is simply an index. it is common to use $|0\rangle$ as a label for the ground state (i.e. the one with lowest energy) of a system. For example, in a quantum harmonic oscillator, the energy levels has the form $\hbar \omega (n + \frac12)$ where $n \in \mathbb{N}$, it is natural to label such a state as $|n\rangle$. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Dec 18 '16 at 0:42
  • $\begingroup$ This is probably a question for the physics board. $\endgroup$ – user361424 Dec 18 '16 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ @user361424, no, this would get closed on physics and migrated over here. $\endgroup$ – heather Dec 20 '16 at 22:30
6
$\begingroup$

The numbers in notations like $|n\rangle$ are the analogues of indices in matrix notation. That is, $|0\rangle=e_0$, $|1\rangle=e_1$, etc., where $e_n$ is the vector which has a $1$ in the $n$th position and $0$ in the other entries. Unfortunately, this notation is unspecific about the dimension of the base space. For qubits in quantum computers, the dimension is $2$, so we only have $|0\rangle=e_0=(1,0)$ and $|1\rangle=e_1=(0,1)$. It is also common to have a countable infinity of basis vectors, so we get $|n\rangle$ for each $n\in\Bbb N$. In quantum mechanics one also deals with this notation for larger dimensional spaces; for example we may have $|x\rangle$ for each $x\in\Bbb R^3$ (the position basis), which is a vector space of uncountable dimension $|\Bbb R^3|=2^{\aleph_0}$.

In any case, these vectors are usually enumerating a basis of some kind, and the details beyond that depend on the context.


The notation $\langle 0|0\rangle$ is written in linear algebra notation as $e_0^Te_0$, which is a $1\times 1$ matrix whose value can be identified with the dot product $e_0\cdot e_0$. Provided that the vector is normalized, this will always be $1$. So a general answer is $\langle m|n\rangle=0$ if $m\ne n$, and $\langle n|n\rangle=1$, which expresses that the vectors $(|n\rangle)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ are an orthonormal basis for the space.

For some general rules, then, we have $|n\rangle=e_n$ and $\langle n|=e_n^T$ (or $e_n^\dagger$ in complex vector spaces), where we understand the first as a $d\times 1$ matrix so that the second is $1\times d$, where $d$ is the dimension of the space. Then the inner product is $\langle m|n\rangle=e_m^Te_n=e_m\cdot e_n$, and the outer product is $|n\rangle\langle m|=e_ne_m^T$, which is a $d\times d$ matrix with a single $1$ at the index $(n,m)$. Note that these notations are also used for arbitrary vectors; for example we might write $|\psi\rangle=v$ for some vector $v$, and then $\langle\psi|=v^T$, $\langle\psi|\psi\rangle=\|v\|^2$, and $|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|$ is the projection matrix in the direction of $v$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, this helps a lot; I'm still reading through it, but so far it has cleared up more than a few confusions. $\endgroup$ – heather Dec 18 '16 at 13:51
-4
$\begingroup$

$<x | y>$ (probably) means the dot product. Other notations are used, such as $x \cdot y$ or $<x,y>$. One half of this expression is as meaningful as $(0,$ or $[1,$ is.

Try the front matter or back matter of your textbook. The less standard a notation is, the more likely it is for the author to do the diligence of explaining it.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Apologies, but I don't have a specific textbook I'm using. $\endgroup$ – heather Dec 18 '16 at 0:25
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ heather is talking about about bra-ket notation. It is quite standard, at least in physics. $\endgroup$ – Ian Dec 18 '16 at 5:41
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $|0\rangle$ is not one half of a expression. It is a vector on its own. $\endgroup$ – Henricus V. Dec 18 '16 at 5:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.