3
$\begingroup$

Lemma: Let $I$ be a proper ideal in the ring $R$ of all algebraic integers, and $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$ algebraic over $\mathbb{Q}$. Then there exists $\beta\in K=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n)$ such that $\beta\alpha_i\in R$ and not all $\beta\alpha_i$ belong to $I$.

Proof: (1) Let $R_K$ be the ring of integers in $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n)$; it is a Dedekind domain.

(2) Let $A$ be the $R_K$-module generated by $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$.

(3) Since $R_K$ is Dedekind, there is a finitely generated $R_K$-module $B$ inside of $R_K$ such that $AB=R_K$.

(4) Since $AB\nsubseteq I$, there is $\beta\in B$ such that $\beta A\nsubseteq I$.


I don't understand (3) and (4), can one explain a little bit.

I was also doing in following way: $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$ are algebraic numbers; we can certainly find an integer $m$ in $\mathbb{Z}$ such that $m\alpha_i$ are all algebraic integers. After this I couldn't proceed to complete proof.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

(3) is false as stated, it should be changed to "there is a finitely generated $ R_K $-module $ B $ inside $ K $". For a counterexample, take $ K = \mathbf Q(i) $ and $ A = (2i) $, for instance.

The modified version of (3) follows from the invertibility of ideals in Dedekind domains. Any finitely generated $ R_K $ submodule of $ K $ is a fractional ideal, and it has an inverse. Take $ B $ to be the inverse of the fractional ideal $ A $.

(4) follows because $ I $ is a proper ideal of $ R $, thus $ 1 \notin I $, for example. Since $ AB = R_K $, we cannot have that $ AB \subset I $ (because it contains $ 1 $.)

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.