$\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}$ I decided that I would try another way of computing $\pi_4(S_3)$. Take the fibration $S_3 \to K(\Z,3)$ with fiber defined to be $X_4$. I want to directly use this fibration.

From the usual way of computing $\pi_4(S_3)$, I know that $H^4(X_4)=0$ and $H^5(X_4)=\Z/2$. (Briefly, you continue(loop) the above fibration to the left to get the fibration $K(\Z,2) \hookrightarrow X_4 \to S_3$ and then you use that the fundamental class of $K(\Z,2)$ is sent to the fundamental class of $S_3$ by $d_3$ in the cohomology Serre Spectral Sequence. Using leibniz' rule, get that $d_3^{0,4}$ is the multiplication by $2$ map. Since $d_3^{3,2}$ is the zero map, $H^5(X_4)=\Z/2$).

Back to the spectral sequence of the fibration $X_4 \hookrightarrow S_3 \to K(\Z, 3)$

Now I will use that I know the cohomology of all three spaces in the fibration: $H^*(K(\Z,3))=\Z[j]$ where $j$ has degree 3. The only possible differential that could get rid of the $\Z/2=E_2^{0,5}$ is $d_6: \Z/2=E_5^{0,5} \to \Z=E_5^{6,0}$. But $d_6$ must be zero since there are no homomorphisms from $\Z/2 \to \Z$ and $E_2^{0,5}=E_5^{0,5}$ survives to $E_\infty$. Therefore $H^6(S_3) \neq 0$. Contradiction.

What is the flaw in my computation of the spectral sequence of $X_4 \hookrightarrow S_3 \to K(\Z, 3)$?


It is not true that $H^*(K(\mathbb{Z},3))=\mathbb{Z}[j]$ where $j$ is the canonical class in degree $3$. Indeed, since the product must be graded-commutative and $j$ has degree $3$, $j^2=(-1)^{|j||j|}j^2=-j^2$, so $2j^2=0$ (and similarly for all higher powers of $j$). In fact, $j^2\neq 0$ and it generates $H^6(K(\mathbb{Z},3))$, so $H^6(K(\mathbb{Z},3))=\mathbb{Z}/2$, not $\mathbb{Z}$ as you claim, and your differential $d_6$ is nonzero and kills $E^{0,5}_2$.

(In addition to $j^2$ having order $2$, $H^*(K(\mathbb{Z},3))$ also has lots of elements in higher degree which are not in the subring generated by $j$.)

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Now I need to understand the contradiction in my calculation of the spectral sequence for $K(\Z,3)$. $\endgroup$ – user062295 Dec 12 '16 at 0:54
  • $\begingroup$ One step closer to understanding spectral sequences! math.stackexchange.com/questions/2054791/… $\endgroup$ – user062295 Dec 12 '16 at 1:23

$\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}$ Here is how you compute $\pi_4(S_3)$ directly using your fibration, and using the calculations that you did in Contradiction in spectral sequence for $K(\mathbb{Z},3)$. You showed there that $H^5(K(\Z,3))=0$ and that $H^6(K(\Z,3))=\Z/2$. We have $d_5^{0,4}=0$ and since there is nothing else to kill or get rid of $E_6^{0,4}$, $H^4(X_4)=0$. Since there is nothing to get rid of $E_7^{0,5}$ or kill $E_7^{6,0}$, $d_6^{0,5}$ must be an isomorphism so $H^5(X_4)=\Z/2$

Using the exact sequence $ 0 \to Ext(H^{5}(X_4),\Z) \to H_4(X_4,\Z) \to Hom(H^4(X,\Z),\Z) \to 0 $, we have that $\pi_4(S_3)=H_4(X_4, \Z)=\Z/2$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.