Suppose $K\subseteq L\subseteq M$ is a tower of fields.

If $M$ is a radical extension of $K$, is $L$ a radical extension of $K$?

My attempt (resulting in a paradox):

I don't know much about radical extensions other than the definition. I tried cooking up this counter-example:




$M/K$ is radical since $\sqrt{2}^2$ lies in $\mathbb{Q}$, while $\sqrt{1+\sqrt 2}^2$ lies in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$.

$L/K$ is not radical since any power of $\sqrt{1+\sqrt 2}$ does not lie in $\mathbb{Q}$.

This seems to result in a paradox since $L=M$?

The definition of radical extension I am using is: An extension field $F$ of a field $K$ is a radical extension of $K$ if $F=K(u_1,\dots,u_n)$, some power of $u_1$ lies in $K$ and for each $i\geq 2$, some power of $u_i$ lies in $K(u_1,\dots,u_{i-1})$.

Thanks for any help.

Main question: Is the statement true or false and why?

Secondary question: Why is there a "paradox"? Radical extension depends on the generators used?

  • $\begingroup$ If we have $x=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}$, we have $(x^2-1)^2=2$ , so $\mathbb Q(x)$ should be a radical extension. There seems to be a problem with your definition, but I am not an expert on this topic. $\endgroup$ – Peter Dec 5 '16 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ I think the working you show is to show that $x$ is algebraic $\endgroup$ – yoyostein Dec 5 '16 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ As I already said, I am not an expert on this topic, but as far as I can remember we do not need that some power of $x$ is in $\mathbb Q$ to have a radical extension $\endgroup$ – Peter Dec 5 '16 at 16:31

We have $L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}})$ and $M=L(\sqrt{2})$, so it should be $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2}}^a\in \mathbb{Q}$ for some $a\in \mathbb{N}$, and $\sqrt{2}^b\in L$, for sombe $b\in \mathbb{N}$. But, there is no such $a$, hence $M/K=L/K$ isn't radical and there is no paradox.

  • $\begingroup$ +1. How about the main question? I know it is false now, is there a simple counter Example? $\endgroup$ – yoyostein Dec 5 '16 at 17:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @yoyostein I think such a counterexample must involve fields of prime characteristic. Right now, I don't have any counterexamples, but I'll think about it. $\endgroup$ – Xam Dec 5 '16 at 18:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.