0
$\begingroup$

Mathematica would leave $\infty+i*\infty$ there, no more simplification.

Before I ask the question, there are number of assumptions I have. If any of them is not right, please point it out. Thank you!

  1. I assume what Mathematica means when displaying $i*\infty$ is $\infty$ in imaginary positive direction. Because $(1+i)*\infty$ would be simplified into $\frac{1+i}{\sqrt{2}}\infty$. The first part is simplified into unit length. Besides, there is only one infinity in Riemann sphere.

  2. If assumption 1 is right: I also think $\infty+i*\infty$ evaluate into $\infty$ which can have any direction between real positive direction and imaginary positive direction inclusive, and that's why Mathematica leave the expression alone.

If these two assumptions are both right, here comes my question:

If the angle between directions of lhs and rhs infinity in an addition is $180~^{\circ}$ (or $2\pi$), the result is indeterminate, or undefined. Except this, is $\infty$ with a range of direction complex infinity ($\tilde{\infty}$)?

Thank you again!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The complex positive infinity would just be an infinitely long vector in the $(1,1)$ direction $\endgroup$ – Anthony P Dec 5 '16 at 5:42
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyP So Mathematica treats infinity as complex positive infinity, not the infinity in Reimann sphere? $\endgroup$ – Zhigang An Dec 5 '16 at 5:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it belongs to mathematica.se. $\endgroup$ – Did Dec 5 '16 at 7:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Did Though I mentioned Mathematica in the problem, the real question is not relevant to Mathematica, or any Maths tool software. My question is "Is infinity + i*infinity = complex infinity". $\endgroup$ – Zhigang An Dec 5 '16 at 7:39
  • $\begingroup$ Reading very charitably your question, it seems you might be asking whether, if $(z_n)$ and $(w_n)$ are complex sequences such that $$|z_n|\to\infty\quad |w_n|\to\infty\quad\lim\arg z_n=\alpha\quad\lim\arg w_n=\beta$$ with $$\alpha\ne\beta$$ then... then what? Then, do we have $$\lim|z_n+w_n|=+\infty\ ?$$ Is this your question? Then 1. it does not show in the current text and 2. the answer is obvious, no? If you insist that the question is not about Mathematica (which frankly I fail to understand, see for example your first comment), one could close this as "unclear". $\endgroup$ – Did Dec 5 '16 at 7:49
0
$\begingroup$

Although this question is in some sense "not about Mathematica", it is confusing for most readers unfamiliar with Mathematica, because the definition of "Complex Infinity" used in Mathematica is not used in any other contexts/texts:

"Complex infinity is an infinite number in the complex plane whose complex argument is unknown or undefined."

Certainly, if $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ are real sequences tending to $\infty$ at (essentially) the same rate, then $\lim \arg (a_n+b_ni)=\pi/4$, a known quantity. Alternatively, if $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ are real sequences tending to $\infty$ at unspecified rates, then even though $\lim \arg (a_n+b_ni)$ may not exist, the arguments (and potential limit value) of $a_n+b_ni$ stay in $[0,\pi/2]$.

If either case captures what you meant by $\infty+i\infty$, then the answer may be "it's not Complex Infinity because you know at least some bounds on the arguments; the limiting behavior of the argument is not completely unknown or undefined."

That may or may not explain why Mathematica does not turn $\infty+i\infty$ into $\widetilde{\infty}$. That would be a question about Mathematica.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! This is exactly what I want to know! Since the result has a known range, it is not complex infinity in Mathematica. Sorry about this rather bad question. I am not Maths major. I confused complex infinity, which only used by Mathematica, and infinity in complex plane. Thank you so much! $\endgroup$ – Zhigang An Jan 31 '17 at 14:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.