61
$\begingroup$

I found this problem in a contest of years ago, but I'm not very good at probability, so I prefer to see how you do it:

A man gets drunk half of the days of a month. To open his house, he has a set of keys with $5$ keys that are all very similar, and only one key lets him enter his home. Even when he arrives sober he doesn't know which key is the correct one, and so he tries them one by one until he chooses the correct key. When he's drunk, he also tries the keys one by one, but he can't distinguish which keys he has tried before, so he may repeat the same key.

One day we saw that he opened the door on his third try.

What is the probability that he was drunk that day?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ This seems like a fun problem. To start we know .5 is the probability he is drunk and sober. There is a 20% chance he randomly chooses the right keys, but when hes drunk he may use the same key more than once (makes it a bit tougher). He opens on the third try. I'm thinking of something along the lines of finding P(Drunk | opens door on third try) $\endgroup$ – Brandon Dec 4 '16 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Brandon "I'm thinking of something along the lines of finding P(Drunk | opens door on third try)" is just restating the question. The question asks you to find P(Drunk | opens door on third try), it just doesn't use that notation. $\endgroup$ – immibis Dec 4 '16 at 22:58
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Oh trust me I know that, I was just laying out a guideline for the OP, rather than solving it for him explicitly like a few people did below. $\endgroup$ – Brandon Dec 4 '16 at 23:14
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ If the keys are like USB you need at least 3 tries per key even if you are sober :) $\endgroup$ – Viktor Mellgren Dec 5 '16 at 20:51
  • $\begingroup$ Out of curiosity, what kind of contest was that? Although it's a fun problem it seems kind of easy for a contest math problem $\endgroup$ – user159517 Dec 7 '16 at 16:54
55
$\begingroup$

The key thing here is this: let $T$ be the number of tries it takes him to open the door. Let $D$ be the event that the man is drunk. Then $$ P(D\mid T=3)=\frac{P(T=3, D)}{P(T=3)}. $$ Now, the event that it takes three tries to open the door can be decomposed as $$ P(T=3)=P(T=3\mid D)\cdot P(D)+P(T=3\mid \neg D)\cdot P(\neg D). $$ By assumption, $P(D)=P(\neg D)=\frac{1}{2}$. So, we just need to compute the probability of requiring three attempts when drunk and when sober.

When he's sober, it takes three tries precisely when he chooses a wrong key, followed by a different wrong key, followed by the right key; the probability of doing this is $$ P(T=3\mid \neg D)=\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{3}{4}\cdot\frac{1}{3}=\frac{1}{5}. $$

When he's drunk, it is $$ P(T=3\mid D)=\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{1}{5}=\frac{16}{125}. $$

So, all told, $$ P(T=3)=\frac{16}{125}\cdot\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{5}\cdot\frac{1}{2}=\frac{41}{250}. $$ Finally, $$ P(T=3, D)=P(T=3\mid D)\cdot P(D)=\frac{16}{125}\cdot\frac{1}{2}=\frac{16}{250} $$ (intentionally left unsimplified). So, we get $$ P(D\mid T=3)=\frac{\frac{16}{250}}{\frac{41}{250}}=\frac{16}{41}. $$

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I upvote your question, but I put as the answer to the given by @lulu because was the first. $\endgroup$ – MonsieurGalois Dec 4 '16 at 21:59
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @MonsieurGalois Note that most often being first is a very poor metric as far as answers go. You should accept and upvote based on the content of the answer, not on Meta stuff like who posted first or who has the most silver badgers. $\endgroup$ – Kyll Dec 5 '16 at 7:17
  • 19
    $\begingroup$ `The key thing here is this: ..." - I see what you did there ;) $\endgroup$ – Stewart Dec 5 '16 at 13:13
43
$\begingroup$

Let's first compute the probability that he wins on the third try in each of the two cases:

Sober: The key has to be one of the (ordered) five, with equal probability for each, so $p_{sober}=p_s=\frac 15$.

Drunk: Success on any trial has probability $\frac 15$. To win on the third means he fails twice then succeeds, so $p_{drunk}=p_d=\frac 45\times \frac 45 \times \frac 15 = \frac {16}{125}$

Since our prior was $\frac 12$ the new estimate for the probability is $$\frac {.5\times p_d}{.5p_d+.5p_s}=\frac {16}{41}=.\overline {39024}$$

$\endgroup$
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @Ovi It is Bayes theorem. $\endgroup$ – Nilay Ghosh Dec 5 '16 at 5:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Using this method, the probability that he is drunk will decrease if he succeeds at finding the right key at a later try (I get 50%, 44%, 39%, 34%, 29% for tries number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 being correct). This seems inplausible. Where is the flaw? $\endgroup$ – mkrieger1 Dec 5 '16 at 14:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mkrieger1 That result seems entirely intuitive to me (though it's worth point out that if it takes more than $5$ tries then the probability jumps to $1$). For intuition, suppose that you have $2\times 10^5$ people doing this independently. Then, in expectation, you have $100000$ sober and $100000$ drunk. Of these, we expect $20000$ of the sober ones to take five tries, but only $8192$ of the drunk ones will win on the fifth trial. Thus we expect $28192$ of the original sample to win on the fifth trial, but the great majority of these are sober. $\endgroup$ – lulu Dec 5 '16 at 14:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @lulu That sounds convincing, altough it is still not intuitive to me. Another example of how humans are sometimes bad at judging probabilities. $\endgroup$ – mkrieger1 Dec 5 '16 at 14:31
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ @mkrieger1 Oh, agreed. Perhaps it helps to keep in mind that $41\%$ of the time, our drunk needs more than five trials. That's a huge number! Thus, the mere fact that the man succeeds in the first five trials is strong evidence for his sobriety. $\endgroup$ – lulu Dec 5 '16 at 14:37
2
$\begingroup$

I tried focusing instead on the number of times he tries a key and fails. So if he gets it on the 3rd try, he misses $2x$. The probability of doing this, given that he's drunk, is $(4/5) * (4/5) = 16/25$. On the other hand, the probability of him missing twice in a row given that he's sober is $(4/5) * (3/4) = 3/5$. Applying Baye's rule, I get

$$Pr(\text{drunk}\mid \text{missed twice}) = (16/25)/((16/25 + (3/4)(4/5)) = 0.51$$

Given that he misses $3x$, I get

$$Pr(\text{drunk}\mid \text{missed }3x) = ((4/5)^3)/((4/5)^3 + (2/3)(3/4)(4/5)) = 0.62$$

$$Pr(\text{drunk}\mid \text{missed }4x) = ((4/5)^4)/((4/5)^4 + (1/2)(2/3)(3/4)(4/5)) = 67.2$$

$$Pr(\text{drunk}\mid \text{missed } 5x) = ((4/5)^5)/((4/5)^5 + 0) = 1$$

The result has the desirable property that the probability starts at $0.5$ and gets higher the more we observe he starts missing the lock. I'm thinking the success on the $x$ attempt should not enter the calculation. I justify this because, we're given the observation that he finally opens the door, so that's not part of our probability calculation. What's really uncertain is the number of times he has to try before he opens it.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What you have is the probabilities that he misses at least twice before he finds the right key, but you need the probabilities that he misses exactly twice before finding the right key. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Dec 7 '16 at 16:58
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please explain? I have $\endgroup$ – user3159090 Dec 7 '16 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry.. getting used to editor.. $\endgroup$ – user3159090 Dec 7 '16 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ I have Pr(misses 2x) = Pr(misses on 2nd | misses on 1st) x Pr(misses on 1st). For drunk, this is 4/5 * 4/5. For sober, this is 4/5 * 3/4, no? $\endgroup$ – user3159090 Dec 7 '16 at 17:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As I said in an earlier comment: suppose you had $2\times 10^5$ people doing this, so $10^5$ sober and $10^5$ drunk. Of course $20000$ of the sober people succeed on the first try, and on the second, and so on. Similarly, $20000$ drunks succeed on the first try...hence succeeding on the first try tells us nothing about sobriety. But only $16000$ drunks succeed on the second try, so success on the second try suggests sobriety. And then only $12800$ drunks succeed on trial three, so the evidence for sobriety is even stronger. Keep in mind that $5$ failures does prove drunkenness. $\endgroup$ – lulu Dec 8 '16 at 21:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.