17
$\begingroup$

If we have a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)$ and $\Omega$ is partitioned into pairwise disjoint subsets $A_{i}$, with $i\in\mathbb{N}$, then the law of total probability says that $P(B)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}P(B|A_{i})P(A_i{})$. This law can be proved using the following two facts: \begin{align*} P(B|A_{i})&=\frac{P(B\cap A_{i})}{P(A_{i})}\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i\in \mathbb{N}} S_{i}\right)&=\sum_{i\in\mathbb{N}}P(S_{i}) \end{align*} Where the $S_{i}$'s are a pairwise disjoint and a $\textit{countable}$ family of events in $\mathcal{F}$.

However, if we want to apply the law of total probability on a continuous distribution $f$, we have (like here): $$P(A)=\int_{\Omega}P(A|x)f(x)dx$$ which is the law of total probabillity but with the summation replaced with an integral, and $P(A_{i})$ replaced with $f(x)dx$. The problem is that we are conditioning on an $\textit{uncountable}$ family. Is there any proof of this statement (if true)?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Fortunately it is true; otherwise we would also have trouble with conditional expectation for continuous variables. I was not able to find the proof in my measure theory book this morning, skimming through it, but going the long way, you may be convinced by the proof of the law of total expectation together with the relation that $P(A\mid B) = E[1_A\mid B]$. $\endgroup$ – Therkel Nov 29 '16 at 7:54
1
$\begingroup$

Think of it like this: Suppose you have a continuous random variable $X$ with pdf $f(x)$. Then $P(A)=E(1_{A})=E[E(1_{A}|X)]=\int E(1_{A}|X=x)f(x)dx=\int P(A|X=x)f(x)dx$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.