Do we know any precise evaluation of the sum: $$\sum_{m \leqslant X} \lambda_2(m)$$

where $\lambda_2 = \mu \star \mu$ ?

That is a first part to my question, which seems to me quite classical but I don't succeed in finding anything (even with the hyperbola principle, and I prefer ask more than sinking into technicalities possibly useless with Perron-like sumatory formulas...). The other part is : do we know a similar estimation for the sum not over integers, but over ideals on a number field ?

Thank you in advance,



We may use the fact that \[\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\mu * \mu(n)}{n^s} = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\mu(n)}{n^s} \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\mu(n)}{n^s} = \frac{1}{\zeta(s)^2}.\] This allows one to use the Perron inversion formula and mimic the proof of the prime number theorem to show that \[\sum_{n \leq x} \mu * \mu(n) = o(x),\] and indeed something stronger along the lines of \[\sum_{n \leq x} \mu * \mu(n) = O(x \exp(-c\sqrt{\log x})).\] The Riemann hypothesis implies that \[\sum_{n \leq x} \mu * \mu(n) = O_{\varepsilon}(x^{1/2 + \varepsilon})\] for every $\varepsilon > 0$, while one can also show that \[\sum_{n \leq x} \mu * \mu(n) = \Omega_{\pm}(\sqrt{x})\] via the same methods as for $M(x) = \sum_{n \leq x} \mu(n)$. In particular, this function ought to be quite oscillatory and satisfy almost square-root cancellation, but have some occasional large fluctuations.

All this also works over number fields via the exact same methods.

To give a classical proof of the first bound, use the Dirichlet hyperbola method to write \[\sum_{n \leq x} \mu * \mu(n) = 2 \sum_{n \leq \sqrt{x}} \mu(n) M\left(\frac{x}{n}\right) - M(\sqrt{x})^2.\] Now using the fact (equivalent to the prime number theorem) that \[M(x) = O(x \exp(-c\sqrt{\log x}))\] gives you the desired result.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.