21
$\begingroup$

Today I was going through my text book exercise and got hold of the following question.

Let $X$ be a normed linear space with norm $\lVert\cdot\rVert$ and $A$ is a non empty convex subset of $X$ then prove that $\operatorname{Closure}(A)$ is also a convex subset of $X$. I gave it a try but could not succeed.

$\endgroup$
0

5 Answers 5

30
$\begingroup$

Pick two points in the closure of the set. Say $x,y \in \bar{X}$. So there exist some sequences $\{x_i\}$ and $\{y_i\}$ in $X$ which tend to $x$ and $y$ respectively.

But for all $i$ and $0 < t < 1$ we have that: $$ tx_{i} + (1-t)y_{i} \in X$$

Now taking limits gives the correct result.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ the proof is a little weak, first need to show really there exists $x_i, y_i$ completely in $X$ which have limits $x,y\in \bar X$ and "Now taking limits gives the correct result" must be justified. $\endgroup$ Jun 13, 2020 at 0:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jale'dejaled, that is a proposition. $x\in\overline A\iff$ there is a sequence $(a_k)_k\in A$ converging to $A$. The assumption is that $X$ is nonempty, so... $\endgroup$
    – Invisible
    Nov 19, 2021 at 20:43
23
$\begingroup$

In fact, the result is true in any topological vector space $X$.

Let $C$ be a nonempty convex subset of $X$. For $x,y \in \overline{C}$ and $\lambda \in [0,1]$, we prove that any neighborhood of $z= \lambda x+ (1-\lambda)y$ intersects $C$. So let $W$ be a neighborhood of $0$. Because $(u,v) \mapsto \lambda u+(1-\lambda)v$ is continuous, there exist open subsets $U$ and $V$ such that $\lambda U+(1-\lambda)V \subset W$; $x+U$ (resp. $y+V$) is an open neighborhood of $x$ (resp. of $y$) so there exists $x_1 \in (x+U) \cap C$ (resp. $y_1 \in (y+V) \cap C$). Therefore, $z_1= \lambda x_1+(1-\lambda)y_1 \in C$ because $C$ is convex and $z_1 \in \lambda (x+U)+(1-\lambda)(y+V) \subset z+W$, ie. $(z+W) \cap C \neq \emptyset$.

$\endgroup$
17
$\begingroup$

Perhaps to get away from sequences, for $t\in I$, consider the continuous map $t: X \times X\to X$ given by $(x,y)\mapsto tx + (1-t)y$. Since $A$ is convex, $t(A\times A) \subset A$.Thus, by continuity we have $$t\left (\overline A \times \overline A\right ) \subset \overline{t(A\times A)} \subset \overline A,$$ therefore $\overline A$ is convex.

$\endgroup$
1
8
$\begingroup$

Let $x,y\in Closure(A)$, $t\in [0,1]$. Choose sequences $x_{k},y_{k}\in D$ such that $x_{k}\rightarrow\ x$ and $y_{k}\rightarrow\ y$. Because A is convex, we have $tx_{k}+(1-t)y_{k}\in D$. Then, $$tx+(1-t)t=\lim (tx_{k}+(1-t)y_{k})\ \in \bar A$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Please what about the converse? That is is $\overline{A}$ convex, is $A$ convex? Thanks a lot. $\endgroup$
    – Student
    Jun 23, 2020 at 17:16
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ No and there is a simple example in $\mathbb{R}$. $\endgroup$
    – Tomás
    Jun 25, 2020 at 11:30
3
$\begingroup$

Given $x,y \in \overline{A}$, there exist sequences $(x_n)_n, (y_n)_n \subset A$ such that $\lim_nx_n=x$ and $\lim_ny_n=y$. Since $A$ is convex, and $x_n,y_n \in A$ for every $n$, we have $tx_n+(1-t)y_n \in A$ for every $t \in [0,1]$. It follows that $tx+(1-t)y=\lim_n[tx_n+(1-t)y_n] \in \overline{A}$. Hence $\overline{A}$ is convex.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How is this different from the answer with the most upvotes? $\endgroup$
    – Ramanujan
    Jul 22, 2019 at 22:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.