6
$\begingroup$

I was reading this article which derives the value for integral of a negative exponent.

I follow the derivation, from circular symmetry, to integration by substitution, and this is the resulting equation: $$(l(a))^2=\pi\int_0^\infty e^{(-ax)} \, dx=\frac \pi a\tag1$$ (where $l(a)$ is some function on $a$.)

And we take the $\sqrt{}$ of equation (1), which produces: $$l(a)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{(-ax^2)} \, dx=\sqrt{\frac \pi a} \text{ for } \operatorname{Re}(a)>0\tag2$$

I understand that the bound became negative infinity because taking the square root gives negative solutions.

However, I don't understand why the exponential factor became $x^2$, and I have no idea where the $\pi$ from equation (1) went. Why did the integral eat the $\pi$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's not how it works. It becomes $\sqrt{\int_0^\infty e^{-ax}dx}$ $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Nov 20 '16 at 13:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you familiar with polar coordinates? That's where the $\pi$ went. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Nov 20 '16 at 13:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Taking a square root" does not "give negative solutions". Even the thing that you mean by that phrase has nothing to do with the lower bound of the integral becoming $-\infty$. $\endgroup$ – Eric Towers Nov 20 '16 at 13:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's really a shame that the equations in the linked article were put in such low-resolution images. It becomes almost impossible to tell what some of the individual letters in each equation are supposed to be. For example, what you read as lower-case L (ell) was meant to be an upper-case I (eye). $\endgroup$ – David K Nov 20 '16 at 16:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ When I saw the title, I honestly thought there was going to be a joke in the answer. $\endgroup$ – Skeleton Bow Nov 20 '16 at 21:16
20
$\begingroup$

I think you're conflating two different things in that article.

First, they discuss the integral $\int_0^\infty e^{-a x}\,dx$ and show that it equals $1/a$. This follows by recognizing $\frac{1}{a}e^{-a x}$ as an antiderivative.

Second, they then want to separately compute the integral $I(a)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-a x^2}\,dx$. To proceed on this second integral, they write $$I(a)^2 = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-a x^2}\,dx\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-a y^2}\,dy=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-a (x^2+y^2)}\,dxdy.$$ To proceed further, they note that the rotational symmetry permits the integration over all $x,y$ to be converted into an integral over $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ with weight $2\pi r\,dr$. Hence $$~~I(a)^2 = \int_0^\infty 2\pi r e^{-a r^2}\,dr=2\pi\underbrace{\int_0^\infty\frac12e^{-au}du}_{\large u=r^2,\ du=2rdr}=2\pi\left[\frac1{2a} e^{-ar^2}\right]_0^\infty = \frac{\pi}{a}~~$$ which upon taking the square root gives the desired result.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.