I'm trying to figure out a nicer rational expression of the following:



But Wolfram Alpha only gives "rational approximation" $\frac{2}{29}$.

Is this the exact analytic expression or is it really some sort of "approximation"? And if it's an approximation, then why is this number approximated?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $\dfrac{1}{14 \dfrac{1}{2}} = \dfrac{1}{\dfrac{29}{2}} = \dfrac{2}{29}$ $\endgroup$ – Moo Nov 19 '16 at 18:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Any terminating decimal can be written as a rational. I imagine that Wolfram might have computed the floating point result of the above, which does not have an exact representation, hence the 'approximation'. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Nov 19 '16 at 18:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\frac{1}{14.5}$ is technically not a rational since $14.5$ is not an integer, hence wolfram gives the form $\frac{2}{29}$, which is a rational. $\endgroup$ – mrp Nov 19 '16 at 18:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mrp I don't think that's correct. How can a number have a property if you write it one way and not have a property if you write it another way? It's the same number. A number is either rational or it's not, it doesn't matter how you write it. $\endgroup$ – user223391 Nov 19 '16 at 18:38

Wolfram-alpha treats all decimals as approximation, and all integers as exact values. (Cf. Mathematica)

Therefore, $1/14.5$ is not the exact quantity $2/29$, but a number very close to $2/29$.

If you want Wolfram-alpha to treat your numbers as exact quantities, use integer quotients.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.