# Difference between elementary logic and formal logic

In Kelley book on topology, in the appendix on elementary set theory, he says in the second paragraph, that "a working knowledge of elementary logic is assumed, but acquaintance with formal logic is not essential. However, an understanding of the nature of a mathematical system (in the technical sense) helps to clarify and motivate some of the discussion. Tarski's excellent exposition [here he refers to Tarski's "Introduction to Logic"] describes such system very lucidly and is particularly recommended for general background."

My questions are:

1) What is the difference between elementary logic and formal logic ? Shall I interpret "elementary logic" as those mental processes that enable me do to logic reasoning and inference (for when I deal with strings of symbols that have a mathematical meaning - as when I do when for example I would work with the axioms of ZFC to derive results) ?

2) What is a "mathematical system" ? (I presently don't have the means to look up Tarski's book, to see what Tarski himself wrote there, what it is that Kelley describes as a "mathematical system")

• I suspect that your answer to question 1 (that is, elementary logic refers to metalogic) is what Kelley had in mind. Concerning question 2 I suggest you look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequence_operator Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 7:58
• @boumol Metalogic is the mathematical investigation of formal logical systems, and is two steps removed from what Kelley means by "elementary logic". Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 8:26
• @PeterSmith But wouldn't that mean that metalogic is actually formal logic ?
– temo
Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 8:33
• @temo It is useful to distinguish a formal logic like a natural deduction system for quantification reasoning from the mathematical investigation of the properties of such a system. Metatheory is usually done informally like nearly all mathematics. Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 8:39
• @Peter: You are absolutely right that metalogic is in general in a much wider sense. I should have said "elementary logics refers to a part of metalogic" (the easiest part). Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 9:01