2
$\begingroup$

Came across a problem in my textbook and I am having trouble with it, the book provides an answer but no workings. Looking to get an explanation of what is going on help I prepare for an exam. If we let $T : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^2$ be a linear transformation. Consdider two bases $V$ and $W$ of the vector space $\mathbb R^2$, where $V=\{v_1,v_2\}$ with $ v_1 = \begin{bmatrix} -2 \\1 \end{bmatrix}$ and $ v_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\1 \end{bmatrix}$ and where $W = \{w_1,w_2\}$ with $ w_1 = \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\4 \end{bmatrix}$ and $ w_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\1 \end{bmatrix}$. Suppose that $ A = \begin{bmatrix} 1&2 \\-1 &4 \end{bmatrix}$ is the matrix of $T$ under basis $W$. I need to find the matrix $B$ the matrix of $T$ under basis $V$.

The solution is:

$ B = P^{-1}AP$ = $ \begin{bmatrix} -30&22 \\-48 & 35 \end{bmatrix} $

But I don't know why.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The columns of the matrix are the images of the basis vectors under Transformation T. But the basis vectors of $W$ are not the standard unitvectors. Therefore the vectors of $V$ need to be expressed in terms of basis $W$. That has got something to do with $P^{-1}$.This is essentially the outline of the answer. Think about it... $\endgroup$
    – imranfat
    Nov 15 '16 at 3:57
  • $\begingroup$ Please do not ask the same question twice. This is not acceptable on MSE. $\endgroup$
    – Alex M.
    Nov 15 '16 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please mention the text book that you find this problem? $\endgroup$
    – mike
    Apr 19 '20 at 19:54
1
$\begingroup$

Here's the idea. In the basis $V$, we're expressing every vector as a linear combination of $v_1$ and $v_2$. That is, for any vector $x$ we write as $x = c_1 v_1 + c_2 v_2$. For linear transformations,

$$ Mx = M(c_1 v_1 + c_2 v_2) = c_1 M v_1 + c_2 M v_2.$$

Thus, it makes sense to investigate where the transformation sends $v_1$ and $v_2$. In this case, your transformation is in the basis $W$.

  1. Convert $v_1$ into the basis $W$. Concretely, this means express $v_1$ as a linear combination of $w_1$ and $w_2$. Do the same for $v_2$. Arranged in matrix notation, this will be some matrix $P$.

  2. Apply the transformation $A$.

  3. Revert back to the basis $V$. In concrete terms, this will be expressing $w_1$ and $w_2$ as linear combinations of $v_1$ and $v_2$. Luckily, this is very closely related to what we did in the first step.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

In order to find the matrix of $T$ w.r.t.$V$ we write each vector in $V$ as a linear combination of vectors in $W$.

So we get $(-2,1)=2(-1,4)+(-7)(0,1)$ and

$(1,1)=-1(-1,4)+5(0,1)$

Also $T(-1,4)=(-1,3)$ and $T(0,1)=(-2,12)$.(Obtained from $A$).

Hence $T(-2,1)=2T(-1,4)-7T(0,1)=(12,-78)$

And $T(1,1)=-1T(-1,4)+5T(0,1)=(-9,57)$.

Now the last step we have to write $(12,-78),(-9,57)$ as a linear combination of the vectors $(-2,1),(1,1)$

So $(12,-78)=c_1(-2,1)+c_2(1,1)\implies c_1=-30;c_2=-48$

Also $(-9,57)=d_1(-2,1)+d_2(1,1)\implies d_1=22;d_2=35$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.