8
$\begingroup$

I have tried to solve this equation for $x, y >0$, $\log(x+y)=\log{x}\cdot \log{y}$ by writing it as this $x+y={x}^{\log{y}}$. But the last expression is complicated to me to get any solutions, I think it has no solution in integers !!!

My question here is : How do I show that for $x, y >0$, $\log(x+y)=\log{x} \cdot \log{y}$ has no solution in integers?

Note: $x, y$ are integer numbers.

Edit 01: I edited the question because I have a wrong meaning, I meant in integers.

Edit 02: I edited the question to show my key idea for the proof.

Attempt: This is just an Idea for the proof

What I think is : $\log(x+y)\leq\log(xy)=\log{x}+\log{y}$ which is less than $\log{x} \cdot \log{y}$ for $ x, y \geq 8$, hence: $2\leq \min(x,y)\leq 7$ , which it's easy to check.

Thank you for any help !!!!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ sorry Daniel i meant in integers not in real numbers , i edited my question now $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Nov 12 '16 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ RHS IS logxlogy $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Nov 12 '16 at 21:03
  • $\begingroup$ how it's equivalent to x+y=x.y , i don't write :logx+logy =log(x.y) $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Nov 12 '16 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, ignore my comment, that was nonsense... $\endgroup$ – Martin R Nov 12 '16 at 21:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @dxiv I think Wolfram is wrong. I agree with you that it's a common mistake. For $\log_{e}$ there is $\ln$. $\endgroup$ – Michael Rozenberg Nov 13 '16 at 5:12
2
$\begingroup$

The following expansion is close to your idea and assuming $\log{y}$ is the natural logarithm.

Case 1. Let's assume $x=y$ then $\ln{2y}=\ln^2{y}$. By replacing $\ln{y}=z$ it's easy to check that $P(z)=z^2-z-\ln{2}=0$ has 2 solutions, the largest one $z_2$ is in between $(1,\frac{7}{4})$ and $\forall z > z_2: P(z)>0$. It's easy to check that $z_2 < \frac{7}{4}$ from $\ln{2} < \frac{21}{16}$.

Case 2. Let's assume $x>y$ or $x=qy+r, 0\leq r<y, q>0$ then $$\ln((q+2)y) > \ln((q+1)y+r)=\ln(qy+r)\ln{y} \geq \ln(qy)\ln{y}$$ or $$\ln(q+2) + \ln{y} > \ln{q}\ln{y} + \ln^2{y}$$ By replacing $\ln{y}=z$ $$P(z)=z^2+(\ln{q}-1)z-\ln(q+2)<0$$

Case 2.a $q=1$. This means $$P(z)=z^2-z-\ln{3}<0$$ another easy to check case that the largest solution $z_2$ of $P(z)$ is in between $(1,\frac{7}{4})$ (from $\ln{3} < \frac{21}{16}$) and $\forall z > z_2: P(z)>0$.

Case 2.b $q\geq 2$. We will check the roots of $P(z)$ $$D=\sqrt{(\ln{q}-1)^2+4\ln(q+2)}$$ and $$\sqrt{(\ln{q}-1)^2+4\ln{q}}<D<\sqrt{(\ln(q+2)-1)^2+4\ln(q+2)}$$ (including for $q=2$) or $$\ln{q}+1<D<\ln(q+2)+1$$ And the largest of 2 solution for $P(z)$ is $$z_2=\frac{-(\ln{n}-1)+D}{2}$$ or $$1<z_2<\ln{\sqrt{1+\frac{2}{q}}}+1<\frac{7}{4}$$ and in fact, with large $q$, is aggressively approaching $1$. In any case, the largest solution $z_2$ is in between $(1,\frac{7}{4})$ and $\forall z > z_2: P(z)>0$.

Note: regarding $$\ln{\sqrt{1+\frac{2}{q}}}+1<\frac{7}{4}$$ For $q\geq 2$ we have $\frac{3}{4} > \frac{1}{2} \ln{2} \geq \ln{\sqrt{1+\frac{2}{q}}} \Rightarrow \frac{7}{4} > \ln{\sqrt{1+\frac{2}{q}}} +1$

In all the cases, we have $\ln{y}=z_2 \in (1,\frac{7}{4})$ or $y \in \{3, 4, 5\}$. The remaining part is to check each $\ln(x+3)=\ln{x}\cdot \ln{3}$, $\ln(x+4)=\ln{x}\cdot \ln{4}$ and $\ln(x+5)=\ln{x}\cdot \ln{5}$ individually, but numerical approaches reveal no integer solutions.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.