What is the intuition behind the terminology surrounding Baire's Theorem? Baire's theorem is considered fundamental for functional analysis. It could be simply stated as 

In complete metric spaces (e.g.) countable intersections of dense open
  sets are dense.

But in many textbooks, there is instead a definition of what it means for a set to be of first category (meager), of second category, or residual (comeager). Then a Baire space is defined as a space in which every residual set is dense, and Baire's theorem becomes "complete metric spaces are Baire spaces".
The terms "first category", "second category", etc. are not needed for the statement of Baire's theorem, nor do they provide any intuition for it.
What is the bigger picture for which these concepts are needed?
Wikipedia says

a meagre set (...) is a set that (...) is in a precise sense small or negligible

In what sense?
 A: The term meagre is the one that provides the basic intuition. A nowhere dense set is clearly small in a topologically meaningful sense: it’s so small that its closure has empty interior. A meagre set is small in the sense that it can be expressed as the union of just countably many nowhere dense sets. That’s not quite so small as being nowhere dense, since a meagre set can be dense in the whole space (e.g., $\Bbb Q$ in $\Bbb R$), but this is still clearly a notion of smallness. And it’s a nicer one to work with than the basic notion of nowhere dense set, because the meagre sets form a $\sigma$-ideal: all subsets and countable unions of meagre sets are still meagre. (The nowhere dense sets merely form an ideal: all subsets and finite unions of nowhere dense sets are nowhere dense.) 
The Baire category theorem then says that if a space is nice enough (complete metric space, locally compact Hausdorff space, etc.), then it isn’t small (i.e., meagre).
More generally, any ideal or $\sigma$-ideal $\mathscr{I}$ of subsets of some set $X$ can be considered a notion of smallness for subsets of $X$. Sets in $\mathscr{I}$ are small; complements of sets in $\mathscr{I}$ are large; and all other subsets are neither small nor large. Some of these notions of smallness turn out to be very useful, and the $\sigma$-ideal of meagre sets of a topological space is one of the useful ones. The ideal of non-stationary subsets of a cardinal of uncountable cofinality is another one that turns out to be very useful.
